
Being accused of fraudulent trading can be a life-changing event. If you are facing such allegations, you may be feeling overwhelmed, frightened, and unsure about what the future holds. You might be wondering what fraudulent trading actually means, what penalties you could face, and whether there are alternatives to an immediate prison sentence, such as a suspended sentence. Understanding your options and the steps you can take to improve your situation is crucial. This article aims to explain, in straightforward terms, what fraudulent trading involves, the typical sentences handed down by the courts, how suspended sentences work, and what you can do to give yourself the best possible chance of a positive outcome.
Fraudulent trading is a criminal offence that arises when a company carries on business with the intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose. This offence is set out in Section 993 of the Companies Act 2006. It is most commonly associated with company directors or those in control of a business, but anyone involved in the management of a company can be prosecuted if they knowingly participate in fraudulent activities.
In practical terms, fraudulent trading might involve deliberately running up debts with no intention of paying them, hiding assets from creditors, falsifying company accounts, or continuing to trade when the business is clearly insolvent. For example, if a director continues to order goods or services on credit while knowing the company cannot pay for them, or if false information is provided to secure loans or investment, this could amount to fraudulent trading. The key element is dishonesty and an intention to deceive or defraud.
The penalties for fraudulent trading can be severe, reflecting the seriousness with which the courts view this type of offence. Under the Companies Act 2006, the maximum sentence is 10 years’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. However, the actual sentence imposed will depend on the specific facts of the case, including the scale of the fraud, the level of planning, and the harm caused to creditors and others.
Not every case results in a custodial sentence. The courts have a range of sentencing options, from community orders and fines to suspended sentences and immediate imprisonment. In less serious cases, where the fraud was limited in scope or value, or where the defendant played a minor role, a non-custodial sentence may be considered. In more serious cases, particularly those involving significant losses, multiple victims, or a high degree of dishonesty, a prison sentence is much more likely.
A suspended sentence is a custodial sentence that is not put into effect straight away. Instead, the court imposes a prison sentence but suspends it for a set period, usually between six months and two years. During this time, you are allowed to remain in the community, provided you comply with certain conditions, such as performing unpaid work, attending rehabilitation programmes, or observing a curfew.
If you comply with all the requirements and do not commit any further offences during the suspension period, you will not have to serve the prison sentence. However, if you breach the conditions or are convicted of another offence, the court can activate the suspended sentence, meaning you will have to serve the original prison term in addition to any new sentence. A suspended sentence is therefore both a punishment and a chance to prove that you can stay out of trouble.
Most certainly, but this will depend on the seriousness of the offence and the circumstances of the individual involved. Courts have the discretion to suspend sentences of up to two years if they believe that immediate custody is not necessary and that there is a realistic prospect of rehabilitation.
For example, if the fraudulent trading was a one-off incident, involved a relatively small sum, and the defendant has no previous convictions, the court may consider a suspended sentence appropriate. On the other hand, if the offence involved a high degree of planning, significant losses to creditors, or was part of a pattern of dishonest behaviour, the court may decide that only an immediate prison sentence is justified. Each case is considered on its own merits, and the court will weigh up all the relevant factors before making a decision.
When deciding whether to suspend a sentence for fraudulent trading, the court will look at a range of factors. The seriousness of the offence is always a key consideration. The court will assess the scale of the fraud, the amount of money involved, and the number of victims affected. The level of planning and sophistication, as well as whether the defendant abused a position of trust, will also be taken into account.
The impact on creditors and others who have suffered loss is an important factor. If the fraudulent trading caused significant financial harm or undermined confidence in the business community, this will weigh against a suspended sentence. However, the court will also consider the personal circumstances of the defendant, such as age, health, family responsibilities, and previous good character.
Evidence of genuine remorse, efforts to make restitution, and a willingness to comply with any requirements imposed by the court can all help to persuade the judge that a suspended sentence is appropriate. The likelihood of reoffending is also crucial; if the court believes that the defendant is unlikely to commit further offences and that a suspended sentence would support rehabilitation, this may tip the balance in favour of suspension.
Not every case of fraudulent trading leads to a prison sentence. The court will only impose immediate custody if the offence is so serious that no other sentence is appropriate. This is usually the case where the fraudulent trading was deliberate, sustained over a period of time, and involved significant losses or harm to others.
For example, if a company director systematically deceived creditors over many months, falsified accounts, and caused substantial financial losses, a prison sentence is likely. Similarly, if the offence was part of organised criminal activity or involved multiple victims, the court will view it as particularly serious. On the other hand, if the offence was a one-off, involved a relatively small sum, and there are strong mitigating factors such as personal hardship or mental health issues, the court may consider alternatives to custody.
The presence of aggravating factors, such as previous convictions for similar offences, abuse of trust, or attempts to conceal the fraud, will make a prison sentence more likely. Each case is unique, and the court will consider all the circumstances before deciding on the appropriate sentence.
If you are facing a charge of fraudulent trading, there are practical steps you can take to improve your chances of receiving a suspended sentence rather than immediate custody. The most important is to seek specialist legal advice as soon as possible. An experienced criminal defence solicitor can help you understand the case against you, gather evidence in your favour, and present your circumstances in the best possible light.
Showing genuine remorse for your actions is vital. This might involve making a full admission, apologising to the court, and demonstrating that you understand the seriousness of what you have done. Taking steps to make amends, such as offering compensation to those affected or cooperating fully with the authorities, can also be persuasive.
Providing evidence of positive personal circumstances, such as stable employment, family commitments, or community involvement, can help to show that you are unlikely to reoffend and that a suspended sentence would support your rehabilitation. If there are underlying issues that contributed to the offence, such as financial difficulties, addiction, or mental health problems, addressing these and providing evidence of your efforts can make a significant difference.
Ultimately, the court wants to see that you are taking responsibility for your actions and are committed to making positive changes. A well-prepared and persuasive case, supported by expert legal representation, can greatly improve your chances of a favourable outcome.
If you are facing allegations of fraudulent trading and are concerned about the possibility of a prison sentence, we are here to support you. At Stuart Miller Solicitors, we have a wealth of experience in defending clients accused of business-related offences and achieving the best possible results, including suspended sentences where appropriate. Contact us for a free, confidential consultation so we can begin work on defending your fraudulent trading charges today.
Responsive
A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.
Empathetic
We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.
Specialised
Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.
Proactive
We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.
Engaged
You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.
Caring
We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.
Tenacious
We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.