• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles

What is the maximum sentence for Online Fraud?

computer fraud

Facing charges of conspiracy to defraud can be an incredibly stressful experience, and it’s only natural to be worried about the potential sentence you could receive. You’re definitely not alone in having these concerns – sentencing is one of the most common issues clients want to discuss with their solicitors. The good news is that while conspiracy to defraud is taken seriously under the law, an experienced solicitor may be able to help minimise any custodial sentence imposed. In this article, we’ll break down the offence of online fraud itself, look at what the maximum sentence could be, highlight some of the key considerations from sentencing guidelines, explore how the right legal representation can argue for a reduced sentence, and explain how to get more help from us.

What is the offence of online fraud?

The offence of online fraud in England is governed primarily by the Fraud Act 2006. This Act consolidates various offences related to fraud, including those committed through electronic means.

Online fraud encompasses a wide range of deceptive activities conducted via the internet or other electronic communication channels with the intent to gain financial advantage or cause loss to another party.

In order to secure a conviction for online fraud under the Fraud Act 2006 in England, the prosecution must prove the following elements:

  • Dishonesty: The defendant acted dishonestly in carrying out the fraudulent activity. This involves demonstrating that the defendant’s conduct was dishonest by the standards of ordinary reasonable people.
  • Intent to Deceive: The defendant intended to deceive another person or persons. This involves proving that the defendant knowingly made false representations or dishonestly omitted relevant information with the intention of causing financial loss or gaining some form of benefit.
  • Financial Gain or Loss: The fraudulent activity resulted in, or was intended to result in, financial gain for the defendant or financial loss for the victim(s). This includes demonstrating that the defendant’s actions led to the transfer of money, goods, services, or other valuable assets from the victim to the defendant or a third party.
  • Use of Electronic Communication: The fraudulent activity was conducted using electronic communication channels such as the internet, email, social media, or other digital platforms. This element distinguishes online fraud from other forms of fraud and is crucial for establishing jurisdiction under the Fraud Act 2006.

These elements collectively form the basis of the prosecution’s case in proving that the defendant is guilty of online fraud beyond a reasonable doubt.

Examples of online fraud include:

  • Sending fraudulent emails or messages masquerading as legitimate entities to deceive recipients into divulging sensitive information like passwords or financial details.
  • Illegally acquiring and using someone’s personal information, such as their name, address, or credit card details, for fraudulent purposes.
  • Creating fake online stores or auction listings to sell counterfeit or non-existent products, tricking consumers into making payments for goods they will never receive.
  • Promoting fraudulent investment opportunities or schemes promising unrealistic returns to deceive investors into parting with their money.
  • Requesting upfront payments or fees from victims in exchange for promised rewards or benefits that never materialise.
  • Establishing fake charitable organisations or crowdfunding campaigns to solicit donations for non-existent causes or personal gain.
  • Developing fake romantic relationships with individuals online to exploit their emotions and solicit money or gifts under false pretences.
  • Infecting a victim’s computer or network with malicious software that encrypts their data, demanding payment for its release.
  • Illegally obtaining credit card information and using it to make unauthorised purchases or withdrawals.
  • Creating fake profiles on social media platforms to impersonate individuals or organisations for fraudulent purposes, such as soliciting money or spreading misinformation.

What is the maximum sentence for online fraud?

In England, the maximum sentence for online fraud varies depending on the severity of the offence and the specific circumstances involved. Under the Fraud Act 2006, the offence of fraud is punishable by a maximum custodial sentence of up to 10 years’ imprisonment. This applies to cases of online fraud where the value of the financial gain or loss involved is significant or where aggravating factors are present, such as the exploitation of vulnerable individuals or the use of sophisticated methods to carry out the fraud.

Sentencing decisions are made by the judge based on the individual facts of each case, taking into account factors such as the defendant’s level of culpability, the harm caused to victims, any previous criminal history, and mitigating circumstances. Therefore, while the maximum sentence for online fraud is 10 years’ imprisonment, actual sentences imposed by the court may be lower, as they vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case.

What factors influence sentencing for online fraud?

Several factors influence the sentencing for online fraud in England, including:

  • Severity of the Fraud: The magnitude of the fraud, including the value of the financial gain or loss, is a significant factor. Larger-scale frauds involving substantial amounts of money or causing significant harm to victims are likely to attract more severe sentences.
  • Level of Planning and Sophistication: The degree of planning and sophistication involved in carrying out the fraud can impact sentencing. Frauds that require intricate planning, technical expertise, or the use of sophisticated methods may result in harsher sentences.
  • Impact on Victims: The harm caused to victims as a result of the fraud is considered during sentencing. This includes financial losses suffered by individuals, businesses, or organisations, as well as any emotional or psychological harm inflicted on victims.
  • Duration and Continuity of the Fraud: The duration and continuity of the fraudulent activity can influence sentencing. Persistent or ongoing frauds carried out over an extended period may attract more severe sentences than isolated incidents.
  • Level of Culpability: The level of culpability of the defendant is taken into account, including factors such as their degree of involvement in the fraud, their level of awareness and intention, and whether they acted alone or as part of a group.
  • Role and Position of the Defendant: The role and position of the defendant within the fraudulent scheme, such as whether they were the mastermind behind the fraud or a subordinate participant, can impact sentencing decisions.

These factors are considered by the judge when determining an appropriate sentence for online fraud, with the aim of ensuring that the sentence reflects the seriousness of the offence and the culpability of the defendant. The Sentencing Council has more information in its fraud guidelines.

Finally, the judge will also consider various factors that may either lessen or intensify the severity of the sentence imposed. Mitigating factors, including the defendant’s expression of remorse, willingness to cooperate with authorities, absence of prior convictions, and individual circumstances, can contribute to a reduction in the sentence. On the other hand, aggravating factors, such as exploiting vulnerable individuals, breaching trust, or having a history of similar offences, may lead to the imposition of a more severe sentence by the court.

How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for online fraud?

A solicitor can assist in various ways to potentially reduce the sentence for online fraud in England:

  • Legal Advice and Representation: A solicitor can provide expert legal advice and representation throughout the legal proceedings, ensuring that the defendant’s rights are protected and advocating for the most favourable outcome.
  • Case Preparation and Presentation: Solicitors can meticulously prepare the defendant’s case, gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and identifying legal arguments and defences to present a strong case in court.
  • Negotiation with Prosecution: Solicitors can engage in negotiations with the prosecution to explore the possibility of reaching a plea bargain or securing a lesser charge, which may result in a more lenient sentence.
  • Sentencing Mitigation: Solicitors can present mitigating factors to the court on behalf of the defendant, such as remorse, cooperation with authorities, lack of previous convictions, and personal circumstances, to seek a reduction in the sentence imposed.
  • Submissions on Sentencing Guidelines: Solicitors can make submissions to the court regarding the application of sentencing guidelines and relevant case law, highlighting factors that warrant a more lenient sentence in the circumstances of the case.
  • Expert Testimony: Solicitors can engage expert witnesses, such as forensic accountants or digital experts, to provide evidence on complex issues relevant to the case, which may influence the court’s sentencing decision.
  • Appeals and Post-Sentencing Representation: If the defendant is dissatisfied with the sentence imposed, solicitors can advise on the prospects of appeal and provide representation in appellate proceedings to challenge the sentence.

A solicitor’s expertise, advocacy skills, and familiarity with the legal system can be invaluable in seeking to mitigate the sentence for online fraud and achieve the best possible outcome for your case.

Where to get more help

If you or someone you care about is facing a charge for online fraud, or are already being prosecuted for such, it is vital that you get in touch with trustworthy legal representation as soon as possible. The team at Stuart Miller Solicitors have decades of combined experience in this area and are ready to assist. Get in touch for a free consultation today.


  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
Based on 346 reviews

Further Reading


Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.