• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles


fraudulent trading

Are you facing a charge of fraud by false representation and wondering what the maximum sentence for the offence might be? If so, you are not alone. Concern about potential sentences is one of the most common things clients ask their solicitors. While the sentence for fraud by false representation can be lengthy, there are things that a solicitor can do to help reduce the time you spend incarcerated (if indeed you are ultimately sent to prison). In this article, we briefly outline the offence of manslaughter, then look at the maximum sentence you can get, the main points from the sentencing guidelines, how a solicitor can help reduce the sentence you receive, and where to go for more help.


What is the offence of fraud by false representation?


In English law, the offence of fraud by false representation, commonly referred to just as ‘fraud,’ is governed primarily by Section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006. This Act defines fraud by false representation as knowingly making false representation with the intent to gain a financial advantage or cause a loss to another party.


The key elements of the offence of fraud by false representation under the Fraud Act 2006 are as follows:


  • False Representation: This involves presenting information or statements that are untrue or misleading.
  • Made Knowing It Was False or Misleading: The person making the representation must be aware that the information provided is false or misleading.
  • With Intent to Gain or Cause Loss: The false representation must be made with the intention to gain a financial advantage for oneself or to cause a financial loss to another party.


Examples of the offence of fraud by false representation include:


  • Submitting forged documents to obtain a bank loan.
  • Providing false information on an insurance claim to receive a payout.
  • Misrepresenting qualifications or experience on a job application to secure employment.
  • Selling counterfeit goods by falsely claiming them to be genuine.
  • Making false promises or statements to induce someone to invest in a fraudulent scheme.


These examples illustrate various ways in which individuals may engage in fraudulent conduct, thereby contravening the provisions outlined in the Fraud Act 2006.


What is the maximum sentence for fraud by false representation?


In England and Wales, the maximum sentence for the offence of fraud by false representation varies depending on the severity of the case and the specific circumstances involved. Section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006, which governs this offence, stipulates that the maximum penalty for fraud is imprisonment for up to ten years, or an unlimited fine, or both.


The Sentencing Council provides guidelines to assist courts in determining appropriate sentences for fraud offences based on the culpability of the offender and the harm caused. The guidelines take into account factors such as the amount of money involved, the level of planning and sophistication of the fraud, the impact on victims, and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.


For example, if the fraud involves a high level of planning, significant financial loss to victims, or exploitation of a position of trust, the court may impose a sentence at the higher end of the scale, approaching the maximum of ten years’ imprisonment. Conversely, if the fraud is less serious in nature or the offender demonstrates genuine remorse and cooperation with authorities, a lower sentence may be considered.


What factors influence sentencing for fraud by false representation?


When sentencing for the offence of fraud by false representation in England and Wales, judges consider a range of factors to determine an appropriate sentence. These factors are outlined in the Sentencing Council guidance and include:


  • Culpability of the Offender: The degree of blameworthiness or culpability of the offender is a primary consideration. Factors such as the level of planning, sophistication, and intentionality of the fraud will influence culpability. Offenders who engage in highly planned or sophisticated fraudulent schemes are likely to receive more severe sentences.
  • Harm Caused: The extent of harm caused to victims, both financial and non-financial, is another crucial factor. Judges assess the impact of the fraud on individuals, businesses, and society as a whole. Greater harm resulting from the fraud will generally lead to harsher sentences.
  • Role of the Offender: The role and level of involvement of the offender in the commission of the fraud are taken into account. This includes whether the offender played a leading, facilitating, or peripheral role in the fraudulent activity.
  • Previous Convictions: The presence of any previous convictions or relevant criminal history is considered. Repeat offenders or those with a history of similar offences may face more severe penalties.
  • Aggravating Factors: Certain circumstances may aggravate the seriousness of the offence and warrant a higher sentence. These may include targeting vulnerable victims, abusing a position of trust, or causing significant financial loss through deceitful means.
  • Mitigating Factors: Conversely, mitigating factors may serve to reduce the severity of the sentence. These can include demonstrating genuine remorse, cooperating with authorities, making efforts to repay victims, or having no prior criminal record.
  • Early Guilty Plea: The timing of the guilty plea can also influence sentencing. Offenders who plead guilty at the earliest opportunity may receive a reduction in their sentence as a reflection of their acceptance of responsibility and the resulting saving of court time and resources.
  • Confiscation and Compensation Orders: In cases involving financial gain, judges may impose confiscation orders to deprive offenders of the proceeds of their fraudulent activity. Additionally, compensation orders may be issued to ensure victims are reimbursed for any financial losses incurred.


These factors are considered holistically by judges to determine an appropriate sentence that reflects the seriousness of the offence, the culpability of the offender, and the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.


How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for fraud by false representation?


Engaging a solicitor when facing the offence of fraud by false representation can significantly aid in reducing the potential sentence and navigating the complexities of the legal process. Here’s how a solicitor can assist and what to consider when choosing one:


  • Legal Expertise and Representation: A solicitor specialising in criminal law, particularly fraud cases, possesses the necessary legal knowledge and expertise to effectively represent the defendant. They understand the nuances of the law, sentencing guidelines, and court procedures, allowing them to build a robust defence strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of the case.
  • Case Assessment and Advice: Upon consultation, a solicitor will assess the details of the case, including the evidence against the defendant and any mitigating factors. They can provide honest and informed advice on the potential outcomes, the strength of the defence, and the best course of action to achieve a favourable result.
  • Negotiation and Mitigation: Solicitors are skilled negotiators who can engage with the prosecution to explore alternatives to trial, such as plea bargains or reduced charges. They can also present compelling mitigating factors to the court to advocate for a lenient sentence, including the defendant’s remorse, cooperation, and efforts towards restitution.
  • Court Representation: During court proceedings, a solicitor provides invaluable advocacy on behalf of the defendant. They present legal arguments, cross-examine witnesses, and challenge evidence to bolster the defence case and mitigate the severity of the sentence.


When selecting a solicitor for assistance with a fraud case, consider the following:


  • Specialisation and Experience: Look for a solicitor with expertise and a proven track record in handling fraud cases. Experience in similar matters demonstrates competence and familiarity with the complexities of fraud law.
  • Reputation and Client Reviews: Research the solicitor’s reputation within the legal community and review feedback from previous clients. Positive testimonials and endorsements can provide assurance of quality representation and client satisfaction.
  • Communication and Rapport: Choose a solicitor with whom you feel comfortable communicating openly and honestly. Effective communication and a strong client-solicitor rapport are essential for collaboration and trust throughout the legal process.
  • Transparent Fees and Costs: Seek clarity on the solicitor’s fee structure, including any upfront costs, hourly rates, or fixed fees for services rendered. Transparency regarding costs ensures financial clarity and avoids unexpected expenses.


When meeting with a solicitor for the first time, you can expect:


  • Confidential Consultation: The solicitor will conduct an initial consultation to discuss the details of the case, including your version of events, any evidence available, and your legal rights. This consultation is confidential, and any information shared remains protected by solicitor-client privilege.
  • Case Assessment and Advice: Based on the information provided, the solicitor will assess the strengths and weaknesses of the case and offer tailored legal advice on potential strategies, defence options, and the likely outcome.
  • Discussion of Expectations: The solicitor will discuss realistic expectations regarding the legal process, potential timelines, and the possible outcomes of the case. They will provide clarity on their role, responsibilities, and how they intend to advocate on your behalf.


Consulting with a solicitor specialised in fraud cases offers invaluable legal guidance, representation, and advocacy to mitigate the sentence and achieve the best possible outcome in a challenging legal situation.


Where to get further help


Worries regarding the potential sentence you could face for the offence of manslaughter can be overwhelming, and you likely have numerous pressing concerns. For further assistance and advice concerning sentencing and other aspects linked to the offence of manslaughter, contact the team at Stuart Miller Solicitors without delay.


  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
Based on 352 reviews

Further Reading


Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.