How Do Police Use Mobile Phone Evidence in Possession with Intent to Supply Cases?

Introduction

Possession with intent to supply a controlled drug is a criminal offence under section 5(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The offence can be broken up into four parts:

1. Possession
2. with intent
3. to supply
4. a controlled drug

Possession – For the purposes of this offence, possession means to knowingly have drugs in your custody or under your control. Possession is not the same as ownership; a person who is looking after drugs for someone else still has possession of the drugs even though they do not own them.

A person can possess drugs even if they are not holding them at the time, so long as the drugs are under their control (e.g. if they are being stored back at the person’s address).

More than one person can have possession of a quantity of drugs at the same time if those persons all have control of the drugs. This is known as “joint possession”.

Possession requires knowledge that the drugs are under a person’s custody or control. For example, if a person puts on a friend’s coat which has a quantity of drugs in the pocket, but the person was unaware there were drugs in the pocket, then the person is not in possession of the drugs. The person lacks knowledge of the drugs and so they are not in possession of them.

Intent – The offence does not require an actual supply of drugs to take place. It is enough if the person who has possession of the drugs intends to supply the drugs to someone else in the future.

The offence does not require a plan to supply the drugs to a specific person at a specific time. Rather, a general intent to supply the drugs to some other person at some point in the future is enough.

Supply – Supply means to give the drugs to another person. Supply does not require money to exchange hands; it still amounts to supply if the drugs are given to another person free of charge.

It still amounts to supply even if a person gives the drugs back to their owner. If a person is looking after a quantity of drugs temporarily for a friend and then gives the drugs back to the friend at a later date, that would still amount to supply.

Controlled drugs – All controlled drugs are listed in the Schedule 2 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. Controlled drugs are divided into three classes: A, B and C. Class A drugs offences carry the most severe penalties, then class B, then class C carry the lowest penalties.

The most common drugs which fall into class A are heroin and cocaine, but class A also includes drugs such as LSD, magic mushrooms, crystal meth, morphine and other opiates.

The most common drug which falls into class B is cannabis, but class B also includes drugs such as synthetic cannabinoids (like “Spice”) and ketamine.

Class C drugs tend to be weaker controlled drugs. They are often drugs that can be lawfully possessed if obtained from a doctor with a prescription, such as diazepam (also known as Valium).

The police have seized my phone, do I have to give them my pin code?

The simple answer is “no”, but there may be consequences if you don’t.

Normally, there is no requirement on someone who is arrested by the police to actively assist the police with their inquiries. This means that there is no general requirement for a person to hand over their PIN code if the police seize their mobile phone.

However, there is a specific police power under section 49 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 which may apply in your case.

S.49 allows police to serve a notice on a person requiring that person to provide a “key” to any “protected information” which the police have seized. This could include requiring a person to hand over a PIN code to a mobile phone which has been seized by the police.

There are a number of limitations on the power under s.49. A police officer giving a s.49 notice must:

• Get written permission to give a s.49 notice from a District Judge or Circuit Judge.
• Be of at least the rank of Superintendent, or be a police officer who has been specifically authorised by an officer of at least the rank of Superintendent.
• Reasonably believe that the person receiving the notice knows the PIN, that the notice is necessary for the purposes of preventing or detecting crime, and that the requirements in the notice are proportionate.

The s.49 notice itself must:

• Be given to the recipient in writing, or otherwise in a manner where a record of the notice can be made (e.g. orally, during a tape recorded interview).
• Describe the “protected information” (e.g. a PIN locked mobile phone) to which it relates.
• Describe what information the recipient of the notice is required to provide (e.g. a PIN code), how the information should be provided (e.g. orally or in writing) and the time by which it must be provided.

If the above conditions are satisfied and a s.49 notice is served on a person, then it is a criminal offence for the person not to hand over the PIN.

I have private images on my phone, so I do not wish to give the police the pin code. What are the consequences?

If no s.49 notice has been served on you then there is no requirement to hand over your PIN. However, if you are subsequently brought to trial for possession with intent to supply a controlled drug, or any other offence, then the fact that you failed to disclose your PIN when asked to do so could be brought up as evidence at your trial that you must have had something to hide.

You also may not have your mobile phone returned to you by police if you fail to hand over your PIN when requested, as the police could argue that there could be important evidence or illicit material on the phone which they have not been able to examine.

Breaching the requirements of a s.49 notice is a crime. So, if a valid s.49 notice has been served on you requiring you to disclose your PIN and you fail to do so, you will likely have committed an offence.

The maximum sentence for that offence is two years’ imprisonment. Recent cases involving people failing to comply with s.49 notices issued in criminal investigations have resulted in sentences of around eight to 18 months’ imprisonment.

Can the police hack an iPhone?

Modern iPhones have very high levels of security. The information on them is encrypted so it is almost impossible to access the information stored in iPhones without the relevant PIN or password.

However, there are two potential ways that the police can try to “hack” into an iPhone if they don’t have a PIN or password.

The first is known as “brute-force” hacking. This involves trying to guess the PIN through a process of trial and error. The police have access to software which can cycle through every possible combination of numbers, trying each combination as a possible PIN.

This is a very slow process and will generally only be successful if the PIN is relatively simple (e.g. a four-digit PIN with repeated numbers). In order to speed up this process, the police often try to figure out more likely PIN possibilities from any personal information they have about the owner of the phone. For example, important dates such as the owner’s birthday or birthdays of family members, if they are known to the police, will likely be tried first as PINs.

The best way to protect against brute-force hacking is to use longer PINs or passwords (at least six digits) and not to use any obvious combinations of numbers.

Secondly, security or technology companies sometimes claim to have identified a weakness in iPhone security software. Some such companies have sold software to police and intelligence services which allegedly exploits these weaknesses so as to allow the user to “hack” iPhones.

However, these weaknesses are usually identified and corrected by Apple in future software updates. This means that the effectiveness of any such security software is short-lived. Also, such software is invariably extremely expensive. This means that most police forces do not have access to the software, and it is unlikely it would be utilised in a “straightforward” case of possession with intent to supply drugs due to the costs involved.

The end result is that, so long as you do not use a simple of obvious PIN or password for your iPhone, it is very unlikely that the police can hack into it.

How can the police prove a phone belongs to me?

The police will look at a range of factors and circumstances in order to attribute ownership or use of a particular mobile phone to a particular individual. This can include the following:

• Where the phone was found – was it found on a particular person or at a particular address?
• Subscriber details – is the phone number attributed to the mobile phone registered in anyone’s name?
• Contact details –contacts stored on the phone may assist with attribution, e.g. if there is a number saved on the phone under the name “Mum” which the police know is your mother’s number, then that would support attributing the phone to you.
• Call patterns – the pattern of calls and messages on the phone may assist with attribution, e.g. if the phone is mainly contacting other numbers which the police know belong to your friends and family, that would support attributing the phone to you.
• Message content – the content of text messages, WhatsApp messages, Facebook messages etc can be downloaded from mobile phone handsets. Those messages may support attribution e.g. if they refer to the name of the phone user.
• Social media/email accounts – numerous social media, email and other personal accounts can be linked to modern smart phones, which may support attribution of the phone to the owner of those accounts.
• Cell-site – mobile phones connect to radio masts called “cell-sites” every time a call or text is made or received, or data is used. Phone companies keep a record of every phone number’s cell-site connections over the last 12 months. Police can use these records to determine the general location of a phone at a particular time by examining the location of the cell-site mast it connected to at that time. Cell-site evidence cannot place a phone at an exact location, but it can be used to prove that the phone was in the general area of a particular mast at a particular time, or to show general patterns of movement of the phone. Cell-site data can be used to support attributing a phone number to a person. For example, if a particular phone number is very frequently connecting to cell-sites near a person’s home, that would support attributing the phone number to that person.

 What information is held on my SIM card?

A SIM card stores the actual mobile phone number and details of the network provider which that number is linked to e.g. EE, Vodafone, O2.

Using this information, the police can contact the relevant network provider and request the registered details of the phone number’s user (known as “subscriber details”) and the call records and cell-site data of the phone number for the last 12 months.

If you have a pay monthly contract phone, or if you have a Pay As You Go phone and have registered the phone number in your name, then the subscriber details will include your name and other personal information which you provided to the network provider when you signed the contract or registered the SIM.

If you have a Pay As You Go phone and you have never registered the SIM in your name, then the subscriber details will most likely be empty.

A SIM card can also be used to store additional information such as phone contacts, text messages or call history. Whether or not a SIM card contains this kind of information will depend on the settings of the mobile phone handset in which the SIM card was used.

For instance, mobile phone handsets have settings options that allow received and sent text messages to be stored on the SIM card instead of, or in addition to, the handset’s internal memory. Similarly when saving new contacts, mobile phone handsets give the option of saving the contact to the handset itself or the SIM.

What information is held on my actual device?

The amount of information stored on a mobile phone handset depends on how it has been used. However, modern smartphones, including iPhones, can store a huge amount of personal information. This includes:

• Text messages
• Call history
• Saved contacts
• Social media accounts and usernames (if linked to the handset)
• Email accounts (if linked to the handset)
• WhatsApp messages (if WhatsApp is installed)
• Facebook Messenger messages (if Facebook Messenger is installed)
• Location data history
• Photographs and videos taken on the device, or received via email of social media accounts
• Web use history
• Any information in cloud-based storage facilities which are linked to the handset

Police have specialist software which can download the stored information from a mobile phone handset and SIM card. The software may even be able to recover deleted messages and information, although the ability to retrieve deleted information is dependent on factors such as the length of time which has passed since the information was deleted.

What type of evidence are the police looking for on my phone? And how is it used in evidence against me?

If you have been arrested on suspicion of possession with intent to supply a controlled drug, the police will be looking for evidence that you have been involved in supplying drugs. This could include the following:

Messages

If a person has been arrested for suspected involvement in street dealing of a controlled drug – what might be called a “normal” investigation for possession with intent to supply – then the police will primarily be looking for evidence of drug dealing contained in messages on the person’s phone.

Police often look for “advertising messages”; messages sent to a large number of contacts advertising the type of drugs for sale.

They also look for incoming messages which appear to be from potential customers, such as messages asking if the phone user is “on” or “about”, or asking for quantities and types of drugs.

Such messages are often written in slang or code. For example, cocaine is sometimes advertised as “white” or just “w”. Police forces have specialist officers who are familiar with such slang who will analyse the messages on a phone.

Attribution

The police may look for evidence of who owns a mobile phone. This is known as “attribution”. If an arrested person admits that a phone is theirs, then attribution is straightforward. However, if no one has admitted that a particular phone belongs to them, or if a person is found with a phone but denies it is theirs, then the police will look for evidence of attribution such as those categories of evidence listed above in the section on “How can the police prove a phone belongs to me?”

Contacts and phone use

The police may look for evidence of who the user of a mobile phone has contacted. This may be relevant in larger drugs investigations, such as those involving alleged conspiracies to supply drugs.

For example, if the police have arrested several individuals who are suspected to be part of a conspiracy to supply drugs, then the police may look for evidence that the various individuals’ mobile phones have been in contact.

Isn’t evidence obtained from my phone hearsay and thus inadmissible in court?

Probably not.

Hearsay rules only apply to evidence that contains statements of fact or opinion. Much of the evidence which can be obtained from mobile phones does not fall into this category. For example, photos and other images, call history, cell-site data and contacts information will not normally be considered hearsay evidence because they contain no statement of facts or opinion.

The only category of evidence where hearsay is likely to arise as an issue are messages, such as texts and WhatsApp. Whether or not such evidence amounts to hearsay requires careful consideration, but often such evidence will not be hearsay. The Court of Appeal gave quite detailed guidance on how to approach the contents of messages and whether they amount to hearsay in the case of Twist [2011] 2 Cr App R 17.

If you are the person arrested, then any messages sent by you do not amount to hearsay, as hearsay rules do not apply to statements made by a defendant themselves.

Messages received to your phone from others may amount to hearsay evidence, but will do so only if the following conditions are met:

1. the sender of the message is not a witness in the proceedings,
2. the message contains a statement of fact or opinion which the prosecution wish to prove to be true, and

• the sender of the message intended you to believe the statement or act upon it as if it were true.

This may sound quite complicated, and it is. Experienced lawyers and judges often have lengthy arguments and disagreements about whether a piece of evidence amounts to hearsay. However, it is worth noting that a lot of messages which the police rely on as evidence in drugs cases do not meet these criteria, and so do not amount to hearsay. For example, a message sent by a potential customer asking to be supplied a quantity of a controlled drug would not amount to hearsay because it is merely a question and contains no statement of fact or opinion. Such a message could still be relied on as evidence that the recipient of the message was involved in supplying drugs.

It is also worth noting that, even if a message does amount to hearsay, that does not necessarily mean it is inadmissible in court. The prosecution can apply to admit hearsay material as evidence in a trial if it meets certain criteria. The relevant criteria are contained in sections 114 and 116 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. They include it being in the interests of justice to admit the material as evidence at the trial, and that the maker of the hearsay statement cannot be found despite all reasonably practicable efforts being made to find them.

What is the procedure the police must follow when downloading the contents of a phone?

There are some procedures that apply to all items seized by police as potential evidence. One such important principle is known as “continuity”. This means that a phone handset must be properly seized and exhibited by the police, and that a proper record must be kept of any dealings with the phone.

A phone handset will normally be exhibited by whichever police officer initially takes possession of a phone. That officer should give the phone an exhibit number, which is normally the police officer’s initials followed by a number. The process of seizing and exhibiting the phone should then be recorded in writing, usually in a witness statement.

The police must then keep a paper trail of every individual – whether a police officer or other person involved in the investigation – who subsequently handles the seized phone. Again, this is normally done by anyone who handles the phone writing a witness statement to describe when, where, how and why they handled the phone, and what they did with it afterwards.

In addition to the procedures that apply to all exhibits, there is also specific police guidance and procedures which apply to phones and other digital evidence. The Association of Chief Police Officers has issued a Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence. This includes four key principles:

1. No action taken when dealing with digital evidence should in any way alter the evidence which may subsequently be relied upon at court.
2. Where a police officer or other investigator has to access the original electronic data, that person must be competent to do so and be able to give evidence explaining the relevance and the implications of their actions.

• An audit trail of all dealings with the digital evidence should be created and preserved.

1. The person in charge of the investigation has overall responsibility for ensuring that the law and these principles are followed.

Many investigating officers now have training in dealing with electronic evidence such as the material contained on phone handsets. In order to download the contents of a phone handset, an officer can use specialist software which automatically downloads a phone handset’s contents into an easily readable report with little additional action required by the officer.

What are the consequences if the police fail to comply with these procedures?

If the police fail to record properly the continuity of a seized phone handset, it may mean that any evidence arising from the handset is ruled inadmissible. This is likely only if the break in continuity is such that it is no longer clear whether the phone in question is the same one that was initially seized.

The consequences of other procedural failures depend on the severity of the failure. If the failure causes a significant prejudice to a defendant such that it would not be fair to rely on evidence obtained from the phone, then a judge could exclude the evidence at a subsequent trial. For example, if a police officer accidentally deleted the original data from a phone and it could not be examined by the defence, then any material which had been extracted from the phone by the police would likely be excluded as evidence.

In practice, these kinds of substantial errors are rare given that most of the work involved in extracting data from phones is automated, and so the possibility of human error is minimised.

I have been arrested and released under investigation; how long can the police keep my phone?

After a mobile phone has been seized, section 22 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 allows the police to retain it for certain purposes, including:

• for use as evidence at a trial for an offence, or
• for forensic investigation in connection with an offence.

There is no specific limit on the length of time the police can retain a seized phone for these purposes. In practice, how long they retain it will depend on what was the reason for seizing it in the first place.

If you have been arrested on suspicion of involvement in the supply of drugs, and the phone was seized because the police believed it may contain evidence, then it will be retained for at least as long as it takes for them to carry out analysis of the phone and download its contents. Technical analysis of phones can take several months as there is a significant back-log with most police forces for carrying out analysis of electronic devices.

If, following analysis, it is confirmed that the phone does not contain any relevant evidence, then it should be returned to you. If, however, the police decide that the phone contains evidence relevant to a suspected offence with which you are charged, then the phone can be retained until the conclusion of any trial for that offence.

If you are convicted at that trial or plead guilty to an offence, then your phone may be forfeited under section 27 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and you may never get it back.

One consequence of the police power to retain a phone as suspected evidence is that, if you refuse to hand over your PIN, then your phone may never be returned as the police can argue that they have been unable to assess whether it contains anything of evidential value.

Author: Michael Goold – Garden Court Chambers

Google Rating

4.6

Based on 339 reviews

Stuart Miller Solicitors (London)

4.6

×

Ayesha Akbar

20:24 06 Mar 24

We had an issue with the police raising an incorrect safeguarding issue against our daughter because we used a Complementary Alternative Medicine (CAM) which they disagreed with (wet cupping therapy). The police wanted us to sign a community resolution order admitting that we assaulted our child! We spoke to Mohammed Zeb who swiftly acted to contact experts in our field and his field, along with experts in social services matters and gave us recommendations to challenge the police. Their weak case quickly dissolved into no further action when the police realised that we would not accept a resolution order claiming we assaulted our child.I would strongly recommend Mr Zeb to all and would use nobody but them in the future.

Samanda Jashari

17:06 27 Feb 24

After searching high and low, they are best solicitors in the uk! They truly care about people and are willing to help no matter when. Very honest and realiable!

paula militaru (paula)

15:37 16 Feb 24

Stuart Miller Solicitors are the best !I been searching online for legal aid solicitors, and I find them!Easy with all documents required, and easy with my case too!They been so helpful to me and they give me a positive vibe every single time we meet up for my case !They are amazing and I definitely recommend them 100 % !Thank you so much to both of solicitors who get my case and god bless them forever !

dean morgan

10:14 16 Feb 24

They where very helpful and contact me as soon as the officers writen to them about my bail.

Sophia H

15:27 08 Feb 24

Stuart Millers were great at dealing with a tricky case and managed to get a great outcome. From the first meeting and hearing, Abu Kibla was friendly, knowledgable and very helpful and you can see a genuine care for his clients. Luke Collins did the day to day and was great at preparing clear written representations and dealing with the CPS. Kathleen Joyce attended the final hearing and despite a last minute time change by the court the day before, she was well prepared, presented the case and mitigation arguments perfectly and was very reassuring and comforting throughout the whole day. Professional, responsive and reasonable fees. Would definitely recommend the firm.

Hassan Ali

20:42 07 Feb 24

Unfortunately I got myself into abit of trouble and didn't have a solicitor at the time. When I was in the police station I was asked if I wanted a solicitor and I said yes and I was then put in a cell till I was interviewed. Officer come to my cell to take me to my interview and asked if I wanted to consult with my solicitor I said yes, when we got to the Consultation room Mr Zeb was waiting for me and he ensured me that everything was going to be okay and this case will be solved with no problems at all and he was right I got NFA and the case was dropped that's all thanks to Mr Zeb he was very professional in this field and was intouch with me and kept me updated with everything that was going on. I will definitely use this firm again in future.

Clare Peters

20:48 06 Feb 24

We would like to say thankyou so much for all your hard work and support given not only to my husband through his court case but to myself as well. Extra thanks to Kibla, Sophie,Bobbie and our barrister Faisal Saifee for the great outcome.

Yeliz Akturk

12:36 22 Jan 24

Many people promise to deliver some just talk nonsense on social media platformsThe truth is that your defence team must be on the same level as your thought if you have any chance of winningMy case was difficult complex and very seriousI thank you all at Stuart miller : Mohammed Zeb and Peter had it not been for your care knowledge support I would not be here todayThank you from my family and I

Jamshad Naeem

22:14 20 Jan 24

Words can not do justice to Stuart Miller Solicitors. I am forever grateful to Mohammad Zeb and Savannah who came to me like angels along with their appointed barrister Harry Mcdonald when my son was on trial. With my son having three charges against him along with joint enterprise which included affray and violent disorder. They took the case on and from the very 1st day kept me updated with the progress and supported me throughout the case. With my son in remand and a serious injury to his face they kept him motivated and in the right frame of mind with video links. Also they were available to him even on weekends if he had any questions. Their guidance and professionalism was absolutely outstanding. Savannah was superb throughout this case. Her approach to everything made it easy for me and my family. The barrister Harry took the case on at short notice and what a outstanding approach he had. Being in court for the 1st time for my son he represented my son superbly. After arguing his defence for my son for 7 gruelling days my son was found not guilty of all charges. I can not praise Stuart Miller enough. A must go to firm if you are in a unfortunate situation and need legal help. Wish Mohammad Zeb, Savannah, Harry Mcdonald and everyone at Stuart Miller the very best for the future. A very big thank you from me and my family.

Colm Walshe

23:14 19 Jan 24

Kiran was amazing with my case, made me feel at ease from the start, was very helpful and professional in resolving matters as quickly as possible. Would highly recommend

Real Cubano

13:03 16 Jan 24

Phil is the best ….Thank you thank you 🙏🏻…..

Phillip taylor

19:05 10 Jan 24

Just spoke to this guy from this solicitors with a concern, And without even knowing me has listened and given me some reassurance and put my mind at rest...Thank you so much .

Kingsley Adjei

20:09 05 Jan 24

They are very good Solicitors. There are 3 people I trust them very well. Small Mohammed. Luke, and Shamika Bonner, she is the best of all, and Luke is the best as well.

Maryam Khan

19:54 19 Dec 23

Great service, very professional, highly recommend!!

J Rowe

21:00 09 Dec 23

Thank you to Holly Lambeth and the team for my not guilty verdict at woodgreen Crown Court.

Maria Missii

11:13 06 Dec 23

Very confidential, professional manner thank you Tasnuva for your help.

asfandyar mahmood

17:49 01 Dec 23

OOPPPS THEY DID IT AGAINTHANKS TEAMESPECIALLY TO NAIMAIF IT WASNT FOR YOUR HARD WORK I WOULDNT BE HERE

Gent Entz

09:45 01 Dec 23

I just like to say a very big thank to Stuart Miller and the team but most especially Victoria, Mohammed Zebb, Kiran and the Receptionist for all their hard effort and now I'm on my way forward with getting on with my own life; Thank you so much StuartMiller and team. I've been with you people since 2012/2013 (roughly 7 years) I'll never forget them in my future career. stuartMiller are extremely kind and respectful. To all you solicitors aswell I wish you all best.Thank you.All the best.

Gabriel Chirwa

15:51 28 Nov 23

When I called for help, straight away, they pick up the call. Spoken to me with respect and followed up with an email of instructions, which is a massive relief.

Joyce Cunningham

05:40 27 Nov 23

Kiran was very supportive to my family throughout our case and was easy to talk to. I was very pleased with the outcome and would recommend them to anyone.

MB London

20:03 23 Nov 23

Kiran was 100% helpful with my case and listened to me and advice me accordingly.I’m really happy with the outcome and I recommend their services to any one who’s looking for a good service and someone that can listen to you and help you with your case. Thank you so much Kiran and the whole team. Excellent job!

Imran

10:48 23 Nov 23

I would like to thank the team at Stuart Miller for helping me with my case, especially Kate andTasnuva, they both were dealing with my case and helped be through it and i am very happy with the outcome. also there price for fighting on my behalf was reasonable compared to another company who were charging extortion money for first consulation.

Abdi shakur Ali

21:28 18 Nov 23

Very helpful. Helped me understand, replied back very quickly.

Alby Davis

03:12 15 Nov 23

Their friendly and understanding demeanor was truly appreciated. I am incredibly thankful to Miller's and their appointed court solicitors for their excellent support.

Keshia

14:50 14 Nov 23

Fantastic solicitors. Would highly recommend them. All staff are amazing

Namna Janapori

06:12 31 Oct 23

Stuart Miller Solicitors are nothing short of miracle workers! When faced with serious charges, I felt lost and overwhelmed. But from day one, they assured me and proved their dedication by being accessible 24/7. They managed to get me out of troubles and gave me a second chance in life.

Mabz

22:54 28 Oct 23

Another one *DJ Khaled voice* Mohammed Zeb thats Big Bro buss another case as usual thank you and it’s always love. Different League Different Class Mike Tyson in the court room. No one try tell me about these fake internet tik tok lawyers in saggy suits using chat gpt to create defences don’t make me catch another case please. Trust Zeb be patient show love and respect and youll be alright. You get arrested go cell request 2 blankets and a fresh grey jumper and tell the Sarge call Stuart Millers then just go sleep real simple.

Sian Evans

20:51 25 Oct 23

Thank you Holly for representing me at the police station. You are a credit to Stuart Miller. Very professional and a lovely person. I can’t thank you enough. I would highly recommend you. ❤️

Kit Jenkins

06:11 19 Oct 23

If you need a criminal defence solicitor that delivers results, contact Mr Zeb. He s the best in his field. From the moment I walked into Stuart Miller Solicitor's office, I knew I was in good hands. His unmatched expertise and personalized approach ensured that my charges dropped before the hustle of reaching out to court, and I couldn't be happier with the outcome. Stuart Miller Solicitors are very good but Mr Zeb is the best. I highly recommend him and the firm to anyone facing legal challenges

Fabian Jones

18:59 17 Oct 23

Incredible legal team! I couldn't have asked for better representation during the most challenging period of my life. They're genuine care made all the difference in my case.

MadDog Lambo

13:11 17 Oct 23

Called Stuart Miller for advice. Bobbi was more than happy to advise me and answer all questions. When i had further questions, Mohammed personally called me to answer them in full. I can not recommend Stuart Miller highly enough and they went above and beyond, in taking the time to make sure all was taken care of and all questions answered.

Ambreen Farooq

20:06 12 Oct 23

I spoke with Mr. Kibla regarding a query I had and he was so helpful and informative. Will definitely be using their services if ever needed.

Norrys 88

10:26 11 Oct 23

Thank you team stuart millerI was on a suspended sentence and i breachedA brilliant director from the firm saved me

Liz Lee

09:59 07 Oct 23

Just want to say a big ‘Thank you’ to Iysha who has represented my daughter in the police station. Iysha remained very calm and professional during this long, painful process while maintaining good communications with the family. She has provided useful advice to my daughter and demonstrated good expertise in this complex area. We hope to continue to work with StuartMiller and secure the best outcome for my daughter.

Berivan Murat

14:13 04 Oct 23

Fantastic service. When I was going through my case they were very comforting and helped keep me sane during my proceedingsAnd was patient through my anxiety

kevin Lutchmiah

12:42 04 Oct 23

Excellent communication skills the correct result thanks guys

Shabbir Ahmad Safi

12:17 04 Oct 23

An excellent firm and knowledgeable solicitorsI had no idea who to got when my money was seizedMohammed zeb was proactive in his advice sensitive to my needs and challenging to the systemI got the cash and won my caseThe moral is: Experience is a mustDedication is trustMotivation is keyThanks

Aishah M

19:36 29 Sep 23

Amazing service, called for advice and they did not disappoint at all, would highly recommend using them

XSimplyChxrryX

13:04 21 Sep 23

They saved my lifeMy businessMy worldThank youTEAM STUART MILLER

Hannah Brooks

12:48 07 Sep 23

Unfortunately got myself in a situation where I needed legal representation. My solicitor was great, but attention needs to be drawn especially to Amirah. She well and truly went over and beyond what most people would do, to help me resolve the situation. Nothing was ever too much, in fact it was her who pushed things further than I'd have even asked her to, she really does care about not just her occupation, but the people she helps. Cannot say enough good things about her... not just good legal representation, but an actual lovely person who genuinely cares, and you don't get that very often anymore. So, thank you to Stuart Miller Solicitors in Wood Green, but definitely, more importantly, to Amirah.

Angela M

20:11 05 Sep 23

I would like to say a big thank you to Savannah Loizides. My elderly mother recently required legal assistance for a police interview as part of an investigation.Savannah was professional, caring and supportive. In the days and weeks following the police interview, Savannah has been helpful and informative answering my questions promptly.I would recommend Stuart Miller Solicitors and would not hesitate to contact them again if the need arises.

Aisha Bibi

14:38 12 Aug 23

My husband was represented by an solicitor who frequently appears on Tik TokWe had very minimal advice the service was shambolicWe had been referred to the director who saw us asap and understood the life changing dilemma he facedWe had proper legal advice and the eventual result was that my husband was found not guiltyI say this to the nation just get an appointment and speak to the teamSome of the people you see on social media are not worth itGuys this is your life . YOU HAVE ONE CHANCE GET THE TEAM AT STUART MILLERAll I can say is you will not be disappointed

Omar Ramjean

22:48 11 Aug 23

Gave some advice about the situation told me what to expect and if I need to instruct they will be happy to help

Lou D

14:30 09 Aug 23

My husband an I are extremely grateful for Abu Kibla and his amazing support representing my husband under such time consuming circumstances. He was very helpful and made us feel at ease right away.We left pleasantly satisfied and would definitely recommend Abu Kibla to anyone needing representation.Thank you

Jake Elliott

11:46 02 Aug 23

Abu Kibla represented me for my second drink driving offence, and not only that I had no license or insurance. Perhaps I am exposing myself saying that but you need the context as Kibla managed to get my ban reduced from 3 years to 2.5, and only a 200 pound fine. Aside from being very professional at what he does, he's also a good guy, who has your back. He explained my situation to the judge in a clear way I wouldn't have been able to. Don't hesitate!

R M

20:05 01 Aug 23

I would like to thank everyone at Stuart miller especially to Kibla for their excellent work. At a time when things were very hard for me they helped me win my case. I hoped for total support from Stuart Miller when I instructed them, I got so much more. I would highly recommend Stuart Miller to anyone seeking for a reliable legal team. Many thanks again for everything, you were brilliant.

Jabrar Hussain

08:21 29 Jul 23

Spoke to a director at 8 amIf I could give 10 stars I wouldAll my anxiety finishedThanks 👦

Karima AMRAOUI

13:37 28 Jul 23

Fantastic firm excellent lawyersBrilliant advocates overall THE GO TO FIRM

Taj Uddin

13:10 28 Jul 23

Thank you for all your help I am great full fir having such a great team who considered all my issues and got me the correct result

Nathan Hallway

12:59 28 Jul 23

Id like to say Thankyou to joe and tasnuva.They really helped me out and was so kind and thoughtful throughout.

maruf kocabay

10:28 28 Jul 23

Brilliant application by Mohammed zebAlso thank you to the team

Bill

13:08 25 Jul 23

Contacted them, rang me back immediately gave me legal advice and said they would be there if ever needed. I can breath abit better with their advice.

Halil Su

17:49 21 Jul 23

I just wanted to say big thank you to MR MOHAMMED ZEB and FUNDA BOZKURT for helping me, I’ve know MR Zeb over 20 years. Best defence lawyer in London, I appreciate your time and efforts.Kind regardsMr Su

Mohammed Hussain

11:04 17 May 23

Excellent service from sincere highly qualified individuals who are truly motivated to help you with legal matters. I specifically want to thank Kelly Morris for her outstanding work in my case. She is an awesome lady and a fantastic legal professional who I simply cannot thank enough! Kelly I will never forget the day you called me with the good news. 10/10 service!Big thanks to Stuart Miller law firm also! I will be using this law firm if any future legal problems arise, but hopefully this will not be the case!

Tishawn Lopez

19:57 19 Apr 23

One of the best solicitors in London seriously they are really helpful from the start to the end and always help you out whenever your in need,I have also referred them to ppl that I know who needed help .Thanks guys at Stuart Millers ,A 🌟

Colin Tan

11:55 20 Mar 23

Helped me with a Tfl charge for carrying an escooter on the LU. Managed to get them to drop the charges on the grounds of public policy and disproportionate prosecution. Responsive, efficient and cost effective. Highly recommended,

Maryam

12:54 13 Mar 23

Each and every member of staff I spoke with were very helpful, friendly and informative, every step of the journey went smoothly and relatively stress free thanks to their professionalism and human touch. Thank you so much can’t praise you enough.

Michael Bracci

19:08 11 Mar 23

Brilliant, from start right till the end strongly recommend

Skrobana Skrobanski

14:42 09 Feb 23

Abu Kibla helped me with Cases when I was younger. My experience with him was Great. Hes A very humble and great man who in my opinion puts his heart into his work. Ive been in trouble all my life and met Many solicitors but none can compare to this man. I Would highly recommend this Company to my friends and family and I can say with confidence this is The Company you are looking for.

ozkan albay

13:31 28 Dec 22

I’m very satisfied with the way all Stuart Miller staff has dealt with me all these years. I have been with Stuart Miller for over 15 years and had no doubt trusting them with my case and friends that I’ve recommended.Thank you for your hard work and hope you guys keep it up.Ozkan Albay

Richard Mills

20:56 30 Nov 22

Massive thanks to Abu and Savannah who dealt with my case, highly professional service provided, couldn’t recommend enough.Thank you!!

Mark Askew

14:47 21 Oct 22

Many thanks to Stuart Miller Solicitors and Reem Khatib in particular. In what is a very stressful, confusing and frustrating time she was the voice that kept everything clear and erudite for everyone involved. Reem's impeccable professionalism, approachability and friendliness made every interaction pleasant and useful. Thank you so much for all your help.

Tommy

15:32 10 Oct 22

Just Wantied to say a big thank you , Reem Khatib, for representing me after 2 and a half years of my case going on and with 3 different firms.I finally found the best one, Reem represented me for around 2 years.She’s so down to earth and has so much empathy. She really helped me at my lowest point. She has a way with words and really knows how to get things done, thank u so much.barrister Ronan McCain was extremely excellent they make such a great team so happy it’s finally over.

Dragon 100

14:50 24 Aug 22

Alexis at Stuart Miller's was very helpful and helped me with every step to help me beat my case

Jahnel Palmer

08:22 11 Aug 22

I really don't know where to start, but this firm is amazing. From my initial contact, then my first meeting With Mr Zeb, I knew I was going to be in good hands.I found myself in a very difficult situation in March 2019 and my case did not come to an end until July of this year. Throughout, there has always been good communication and although the outcome of my case was not looking good, I'm glad the team were honest about what to expect.I would like to thank Reem Khatib especially, who went above and beyond. I couldn't have asked for a better solicitor. Very thorough and informative and helped put my mind at ease as there were several aspects of my case that made things extremely difficult. One thing I loved about Reem was that she cared. Really, really cared, which is what you want in a situation like this. In the lead up to my sentencing hearing, Reem was abroad and still checked in with me.I was expecting a custodial sentence with a starting point of 5 years and managed to leave court with a suspended sentence/community service. This could only be down to Reem's dedication and hard work. Nobody expected this and I am very glad to have had her working on my case. As well as my Barrister, Lily, special thanks to you also. I really don't think I would have had this outcome had it not have been for you two.I am glad this is finally over and once again would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Reem. She really fought for the best possible outcome, which I received.I will never find myself in any trouble again, but would highly recommend Stuart Miller Solicitors for anyone that may need a solicitor.Thanks againJahnel

Alexander Ioannides

15:41 28 Jun 22

thank you so much to Selina for her service and Stuart miller on my hearing after a long trial justic was truley served not guilty i recommend stuart and miller for a true brilliant result

karen kianfar

16:39 24 Jun 22

I highly recommend! A lady I spoke to called Donna was extremely helpful. Thanks again.

Deniz Arif

16:49 11 Jun 22

I was recommended to speak to selina. I called her out of office hours to assist with a arrest.She was extremely helpful, considerate and knowledgeable regarding the incident. I could see that she had mine and my families best interests at heart as a criminal defence paralegal. I would definitely recommend her for anyone that finds themselves in a sticky situation.

Stewart Skipsey

12:58 08 Jun 22

I would like to thank everyone, especially Salina who handled my case so professionally. She was always in the office, when I needed to speak with her, always approachable and always giving me sound advice, even the lady in reception was very honest and professional, everyone at Stuart Miller solicitor's take a bow, i will always remember you all and the result you got me, a big fat not Guilty, God bless

Josh Smart

10:44 25 May 22

Kate Blackmore was in charge of my case, she was fully professional, made me feel at ease, kept me fully informed at all times and would always respond in a timely manner, Kate always address all of my questions and worries very thoroughly. Definitely recommend

Tkay #6

16:53 19 May 22

Stuart Miller helped me navigate through the legal process for the first time, providing excellent guidance throughout the entirety of such a stressful period. I would like to thank Selina Guler for her wonderful work in preparing my defence, as well as Joe Barlow, who were exceptionally helpful throughout the process, explaining everything that arose in detail so as to ensure I could make informed decisions throughout. My experience felt personalised, and gave me the reassurances I needed to calm my nerves, in comparison to the regular ignorant demeanour that typically comes hand in hand with law firms. I felt supported and in safe hands from my initial enquiry right through to the end.

Seven Horses

21:49 17 May 22

Phenomenal, communication was immeasurable, especially Dee, went the extra mile.

See all reviewsWrite a review

×