• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles

What is the maximum sentence for Mortgage Fraud?

fraud case examples

Are you facing an accusation of mortgage fraud and wondering about the potential maximum penalty for such an offence? While the consequences for mortgage fraud can be severe, there are avenues a solicitor can explore to potentially mitigate the duration of your incarceration (should you be convicted and sentenced to prison). In this article, we provide a brief overview of the offence of mortgage fraud, followed by an examination of the maximum sentence you could face, key points from the sentencing guidelines, how a solicitor can assist in reducing your sentence, and where to seek further assistance.

What is the offence of mortgage fraud?

In England, mortgage fraud refers to the act of deceitfully obtaining a mortgage loan or manipulating information in the mortgage application process for financial gain or to deceive lenders. Several statutes and laws govern mortgage fraud, including but not limited to:

  • Fraud Act 2006: This legislation addresses various forms of fraudulent activities, including false representations made with the intent to deceive.
  • Theft Act 1968: Sections of this act pertain to offences related to deception and false representation.
  • Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: This legislation regulates financial activities and provides measures to prevent financial fraud.
  • Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Provisions of this act deal with money laundering offences, which may be connected to mortgage fraud schemes.
  • Fraudulent Trading (Companies Act 2006): This law addresses fraudulent activities carried out by individuals or companies, which may include mortgage fraud.
  • Land Registration Act 2002: Certain provisions within this act pertain to fraudulent practices related to property transactions, including mortgages.
  • Criminal Justice Act 1987: Sections of this act cover offences related to false accounting and fraudulent trading, which may intersect with mortgage fraud cases.

Principles of common law, such as those related to deceit and conspiracy, can also be applied in prosecuting mortgage fraud cases. To secure a conviction for mortgage fraud, the prosecution must typically prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • Intent to Deceive: The accused intended to deceive the lender or financial institution involved in the mortgage transaction.
  • False Representation: The accused made false statements, provided misleading information, or withheld material facts during the mortgage application process.
  • Materiality: The false representation or omission was material to the lender’s decision to grant the mortgage loan.
  • Knowledge: The accused knew or was reckless as to the falsity of the information provided.
  • Financial Gain: The accused obtained a financial benefit, such as a mortgage loan or proceeds from the sale of the property, as a result of the fraudulent activity.

Examples of mortgage fraud offences include:

  • Submitting forged documents, such as fake income statements or employment verification letters, to secure a mortgage.
  • Providing false information about the property’s value or condition to inflate its appraisal.
  • Concealing existing mortgage loans or debts during the application process.
  • Engaging in identity theft to apply for a mortgage using another person’s identity.
  • Colluding with real estate appraisers to artificially inflate the property’s value.
  • Falsifying occupancy status to qualify for a mortgage intended for primary residences.
  • Misrepresenting the source or amount of the down payment funds.
  • Altering bank statements or financial records to meet the lender’s eligibility criteria.
  • Failing to disclose financial liabilities or pending legal actions against the property.
  • Bribing mortgage brokers or loan officers to approve fraudulent mortgage applications.

What is the maximum sentence for mortgage fraud?

In England and Wales, the maximum sentence for mortgage fraud can vary depending on the severity of the offence and the specific circumstances of the case. The Sentencing Council provides guidelines to assist judges in determining appropriate sentences for various criminal offences, including mortgage fraud.

According to the Sentencing Council’s fraud guidelines, the seriousness of mortgage fraud is assessed based on factors such as the level of planning, the degree of sophistication, the financial harm caused, and the offender’s culpability. The guideline categorises offences into different levels of harm and culpability, which in turn influence the sentence imposed. Under the Fraud Act 2006, the maximum sentence is 10 years’ imprisonment.

In cases of mortgage fraud involving high levels of harm and culpability, where significant financial losses are incurred or the fraud is perpetrated with a high degree of sophistication and planning, the maximum penalty can be substantial. Offenders convicted of such serious offences could potentially face lengthy custodial sentences, often measured in years rather than months.

Additionally, sentences for mortgage fraud may also include ancillary orders, such as confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, designed to deprive offenders of the financial benefits derived from their criminal conduct. These orders can involve the confiscation of assets or the imposition of financial penalties in addition to any prison sentence.

While there isn’t a specific maximum sentence outlined solely for mortgage fraud, the severity of the offence and the resulting harm will determine the potential range of penalties, which can include lengthy imprisonment for the most serious cases.

What factors influence sentencing for mortgage fraud?

When sentencing for mortgage fraud in England and Wales, judges consider a range of factors to determine an appropriate penalty. These factors include both aggravating (which increase the seriousness of the offence) and mitigating (which lessen the seriousness) circumstances. Here are the main considerations a judge will take into account when sentencing for mortgage fraud, based on Sentencing Council guidance and general principles of sentencing:

  • Level of Harm: The financial harm caused by the fraud is a significant factor in determining the severity of the offence. Judges assess the amount of money involved, the impact on victims and financial institutions, and any resulting losses or damage.
  • Degree of Culpability: This refers to the level of the offender’s responsibility and blameworthiness. Factors such as the offender’s role in the fraud scheme, their level of planning and sophistication, and their awareness of the fraudulent nature of their actions are considered.
  • Aggravating Factors: These are circumstances that increase the seriousness of the offence and warrant a harsher sentence. Examples of aggravating factors in mortgage fraud cases may include:
    • Deliberate targeting of vulnerable victims or institutions.
    • Involvement of multiple offenders or organised crime groups.
    • Abuse of trust, such as exploiting a position of authority or influence.
    • Attempts to conceal or disguise the fraudulent activity.
  • Mitigating Factors: These are circumstances that reduce the seriousness of the offence and may result in a more lenient sentence. Mitigating factors in mortgage fraud cases can include:
    • Early guilty pleas, demonstrating remorse and acceptance of responsibility.
    • Cooperation with authorities, including providing information or assisting in the investigation.
    • Lack of previous convictions or evidence of good character.
    • Personal circumstances, such as mental health issues or financial difficulties, which may have contributed to the offending behaviour.
  • Impact on Victims: The effect of the fraud on individuals, businesses, and the wider community is considered. Judges may take into account the emotional, financial, and reputational harm suffered by victims as a result of the fraudulent activity.
  • Deterrence and Public Confidence: Sentences for mortgage fraud also aim to deter others from engaging in similar criminal conduct and maintain public confidence in the integrity of financial systems. Therefore, sentences may be adjusted to reflect the need for general deterrence and to send a clear message about the seriousness of the offence.
  • Previous Convictions: The offender’s criminal history, including any previous convictions for similar or related offences, will be taken into account when determining the appropriate sentence.
  • Restitution and Compensation: Judges may consider whether the offender has made efforts to repay the victims or compensate for the financial losses incurred as a result of the fraud.

Sentencing for mortgage fraud involves a careful balancing of these factors to ensure that the punishment reflects the gravity of the offence, the culpability of the offender, and the need for justice and deterrence. Each case is considered individually, and judges have discretion to tailor sentences to the specific circumstances of the case.

How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for mortgage fraud?

There are several ways in which a solicitor can help:

  • Legal Advice and Strategy: A solicitor can provide comprehensive legal advice on the specific charges faced by the defendant and the potential consequences, including the likely sentence if convicted. They can assess the strength of the prosecution’s case and develop a strategic defence plan tailored to the individual circumstances of the case.
  • Representation in Court: Having a solicitor represent the defendant in court is essential for ensuring that their rights are protected and their case is presented effectively. A skilled solicitor can advocate on behalf of the defendant, challenge evidence presented by the prosecution, and present mitigating factors to the court to seek a more favourable outcome.
  • Mitigation Presentation: During sentencing proceedings, a solicitor can present mitigating factors to the court to highlight aspects of the defendant’s character, background, and personal circumstances that may warrant a more lenient sentence. This can include evidence of remorse, rehabilitation efforts, and positive contributions to society.

Where to get more help

Worries about the potential sentence you could face for mortgage fraud can be overwhelming, and you likely have several pressing questions. For further assistance and advice on sentencing and other aspects concerning the offence of mortgage fraud, contact the team at Stuart Miller Solicitors today. Our approachable and understanding staff are ready to assist with your case.


  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
Based on 346 reviews

Further Reading


Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.