• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles

What is the maximum sentence for Identity Fraud?

investment fraud

If you or someone you know is facing allegations of identity fraud, you may be curious about the potential maximum sentence for this offence. You’re not alone – concerns over sentencing are prevalent, often a primary query directed towards solicitors. Despite the severe penalties for identity fraud, solicitors can employ various strategies to potentially reduce the duration of any custodial sentence, should a conviction lead to imprisonment. In this article, we provide a brief overview of the offence of identity fraud, followed by an examination of the maximum sentence permissible under English law, key points derived from the sentencing guidelines, ways in which a solicitor may assist in reducing your sentence, and outline where to seek further assistance.

What is the offence of identity fraud?

Identity fraud in England involves the fraudulent use of someone else’s identity for personal gain or to commit a criminal act. It encompasses a wide range of activities, including but not limited to, using someone else’s personal information to open bank accounts, obtain credit cards, apply for loans, or make purchases without their consent. The offence can also involve creating false identities or altering existing ones to deceive others.

The primary legislation governing identity fraud in England is the Fraud Act 2006, which provides the legal framework for prosecuting various types of fraudulent activities, including identity fraud. Additionally, other laws such as the Identity Documents Act 2010 and the Computer Misuse Act 1990 may also be applicable depending on the circumstances of the case.

To secure a conviction for identity fraud, the prosecution must typically prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • The defendant knowingly misrepresented or concealed their identity.
  • The misrepresentation or concealment was made with the intention of gaining a benefit, causing a loss to another person, or causing damage to another person’s property.
  • The misrepresentation or concealment was made dishonestly.

Here are some examples of identity fraud:

  • Using someone else’s credit card information to make online purchases.
  • Opening a bank account using a false name and address.
  • Applying for a loan using another person’s financial information.
  • Using stolen identity documents to obtain employment.
  • Falsifying documents to apply for a passport in someone else’s name.
  • Using a deceased person’s identity to collect benefits or access their financial accounts.
  • Obtaining a driver’s licence using forged identity documents.
  • Creating fake social media accounts using someone else’s name and photos.
  • Selling counterfeit identity documents to others.
  • Hacking into someone’s email or social media accounts to impersonate them online.

What is the maximum sentence for identity fraud?

In England and Wales, the maximum sentence for identity fraud varies depending on the severity of the offence and the specific circumstances of the case. The Fraud Act 2006, which is the primary legislation governing identity fraud, has a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment for the most serious of crimes.

The Sentencing Council for England and Wales provides sentencing guidelines for judges and magistrates to assist them in determining appropriate sentences for various offences, including fraud-related offences like identity fraud. These guidelines outline a range of potential sentences based on the culpability and harm factors present in the case.

For identity fraud cases where the harm caused is significant and the defendant’s culpability is high, the sentencing guidelines suggest that a custodial sentence is likely. The length of the custodial sentence will depend on the specific circumstances of the case, including the extent of the harm caused and any aggravating or mitigating factors present.

Judges and magistrates have discretion when sentencing offenders, and they will consider all relevant factors before determining an appropriate sentence. In cases of identity fraud, where significant harm has been caused or where the offence is particularly serious, offenders could potentially face lengthy custodial sentences.

In the end, the maximum sentence for identity fraud in England and Wales is determined by the court on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all relevant factors and sentencing guidelines provided by the Sentencing Council.

What factors influence sentencing for identity fraud?

When sentencing for identity fraud in England and Wales, judges have to take into account various factors to determine an appropriate sentence. These factors help assess the seriousness of the offence and the level of culpability of the offender. These are the main considerations:

  • Culpability: This refers to the level of responsibility or blameworthiness of the offender. Factors that may increase culpability include premeditation, sophistication of the fraud, and deliberate targeting of vulnerable victims.
  • Harm: The extent of harm caused by the identity fraud is a crucial factor. This includes financial loss to victims, emotional distress, and any other negative consequences resulting from the offence.
  • Benefit: The financial or other benefits gained by the offender through the identity fraud are considered. This includes any monetary gain or other advantages obtained as a result of the fraudulent activity.
  • Impact on the Victim: Judges assess the impact of the identity fraud on the victims, including any emotional distress, inconvenience, or long-term consequences suffered by the individuals whose identities were stolen or misused.
  • Aggravating Factors: These are factors that worsen the seriousness of the offence and may result in a more severe sentence. Aggravating factors in identity fraud cases may include targeting vulnerable individuals, involvement of multiple victims, or a pattern of fraudulent behaviour over a prolonged period.
  • Mitigating Factors: Conversely, mitigating factors are circumstances that may reduce the offender’s culpability or warrant a more lenient sentence. Mitigating factors in identity fraud cases could include genuine remorse, cooperation with authorities, or evidence of attempts to make amends for the offence.
  • Role of the Offender: The level of involvement or responsibility of the offender in the identity fraud scheme is considered. This includes whether the offender acted alone or as part of an organised criminal group, as well as the degree of planning and sophistication involved in the fraudulent activity.
  • Previous Convictions: The offender’s criminal history, including any previous convictions for similar offences or other relevant criminal conduct, is taken into account when determining the appropriate sentence.
  • Early Guilty Plea: If the offender pleads guilty at an early stage of the proceedings, they may receive a reduced sentence as a recognition of their cooperation and acceptance of responsibility for the offence.

Judges refer to the Sentencing Council’s guidelines for fraud offences, which provide a framework for sentencing based on the culpability and harm factors present in the case. These guidelines help ensure consistency and proportionality in sentencing decisions across different identity fraud cases.

By carefully considering these factors, judges aim to impose sentences that are fair, proportionate, and tailored to the specific circumstances of each identity fraud case.

How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for identity fraud?

A solicitor can play a crucial role in helping to reduce the sentence for identity fraud by providing expert legal advice, building a strong defence case, and advocating on behalf of the defendant throughout the legal process. Here’s how a solicitor can assist:

  • Legal Expertise: A solicitor specialising in fraud cases will have a thorough understanding of the relevant laws and legal precedents surrounding identity fraud. They can assess the details of the case, identify potential defences or mitigating factors, and provide strategic advice on how to proceed.
  • Case Preparation: Solicitors can conduct thorough investigations to gather evidence, interview witnesses, and uncover any mitigating factors that could help reduce the defendant’s culpability or mitigate the harm caused by the offence. This includes obtaining documentary evidence, such as financial records or communications, to support the defence case.
  • Negotiation Skills: Solicitors are skilled negotiators who can engage with prosecutors to seek reduced charges or negotiate plea bargains that result in lighter sentencing outcomes. They can present mitigating factors and arguments for leniency to prosecutors and the court, aiming to secure the most favourable outcome for the defendant.
  • Court Representation: A solicitor will represent the defendant in court proceedings, presenting the defence case effectively, cross-examining witnesses, and making persuasive legal arguments on behalf of the defendant. They can also provide support and guidance to the defendant throughout the court process, helping to alleviate stress and anxiety.
  • Sentencing Advocacy: During sentencing hearings, solicitors can advocate for leniency by presenting mitigating factors and arguments for a reduced sentence. They can highlight the defendant’s remorse, cooperation with authorities, and efforts to make amends for the offence, aiming to persuade the court to impose a lighter sentence.

When meeting with a solicitor for the first time, you can expect them to listen attentively to your case, ask detailed questions to understand the circumstances and evidence, and provide honest and realistic advice on the potential outcomes and strategies for defending against the charges. They will explain their fee structure and outline the next steps in the legal process, ensuring that you are fully informed and supported throughout the proceedings.

Where to get more help

Choosing the right solicitor for an identity fraud case is essential. Look for solicitors with expertise and experience in handling fraud cases, particularly those involving identity fraud. Consider factors such as their track record of success, reputation within the legal community, and client testimonials. For advice on what to do next, reach out to the team at Stuart Miller Solicitors today.


  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
Based on 346 reviews

Further Reading


Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.