• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles

What is the maximum sentence for fraud by abuse of position?

prison cell bed

Are you or is someone you care about facing a charge of fraud by abuse of position? If so, it’s understandable that you would feel anxious about the potential consequences. One of the most frequent concerns individuals in this situation have is the maximum sentence associated with this type of offence. While the potential sentence can indeed be significant, there are steps a solicitor can take to advocate on your behalf and potentially mitigate the outcome. In this article, we’ll provide a brief overview of this offence, address the maximum sentence, discuss key points from the sentencing guidelines, explain how a solicitor can assist in navigating the legal process, and offer resources for further support.

What is the offence of fraud by abuse of position?

 In England, the offence of fraud by abuse of position is governed primarily by the Fraud Act 2006. Section 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 specifically deals with fraud by abuse of position. This section outlines the elements of the offence and provides the legal framework for prosecuting individuals who engage in such conduct.

The elements of the offence of fraud by abuse of position under the Fraud Act 2006 include:

  • Dishonestly abusing a position: The individual must occupy a position in which they are expected to safeguard the financial interests of another person or entity. This position could be in employment, as a trustee, as an agent, or in any other similar capacity.
  • Intention to make a gain, cause a loss, or expose another to a risk of loss: The individual must act with the intention of making a financial gain for themselves or someone else, causing a financial loss to another person or entity, or exposing another person or entity to a risk of financial loss.
  • Dishonesty: The conduct must be dishonest according to the standards of ordinary, reasonable people.

What are some examples of fraud by abuse of position?

 A company director misusing their position to transfer funds from the company’s accounts into their personal bank account.

  • An employee embezzling funds from their employer by abusing their access to financial accounts.
  • A trustee of a charity using charity funds for personal expenses.
  • A financial advisor exploiting their position to manipulate investments for personal gain.
  • A caregiver misappropriating funds from an elderly person’s bank account for personal use.
  • A lawyer mishandling a client’s funds by diverting them into their own accounts.
  • A bank employee exploiting their access to customer accounts to make unauthorised withdrawals.
  • A government official accepting bribes or kickbacks in exchange for awarding contracts or favourable treatment.
  • A trustee of a pension fund misappropriating funds for personal investments.
  • A teacher manipulating school finances for personal gain.
  • An accountant fabricating financial records to conceal embezzlement of company funds.
  • A landlord overcharging tenants or misusing security deposits.
  • An executor of a will diverting estate assets for their own benefit.
  • An investment manager misusing client funds for speculative trading without authorisation.

These examples illustrate instances where individuals in positions of trust or responsibility exploit their roles for personal financial gain, causing harm to others or putting them at risk of financial loss.

What is the maximum sentence for fraud by abuse of position?

In England and Wales, the maximum sentence for fraud by abuse of position depends on the severity of the offence and various aggravating or mitigating factors involved in each case. The Sentencing Council provides guidelines for judges and magistrates to assist in determining appropriate sentences for offences, including fraud. The maximum sentence in any case is 10 years’ custody.

For fraud by abuse of position, the Sentencing Council’s guideline outlines the factors that should be considered in sentencing. These factors include the amount of money involved, the level of planning and sophistication of the fraud, the degree of breach of trust, the impact on victims, and the level of cooperation with authorities, among others.

According to the guidelines, the starting point for sentencing for fraud by abuse of position can vary widely depending on these factors. In cases where the amount of money involved is relatively low and there are mitigating circumstances, the sentence may be less severe. However, in cases involving significant amounts of money, substantial breach of trust, or other aggravating factors, the sentence can be more severe.

While the Sentencing Council provides guidance on the appropriate range of sentences for various types of fraud, including fraud by abuse of position, the actual sentence imposed in each case is ultimately at the discretion of the judge or magistrate. In cases where the offence is particularly serious, individuals convicted of fraud by abuse of position may face imprisonment for a considerable period of time, potentially up to several years.

If you are concerned about sentencing, it is vital that you ask a solicitor for the latest information on the Sentencing Council guidelines and any other relevant legal sources, as sentencing guidelines and legal provisions may be subject to updates and changes over time.

What factors influence sentencing for fraud by abuse of position?

 When determining the appropriate sentence for fraud by abuse of position, judges strive to consider the individual circumstances of each case. They aim to balance several factors to ensure that the punishment aligns with the seriousness of the offence and the level of culpability of the offender. In doing so, judges take into account:

  • Need for Punishment: The sentence should reflect the severity of the offence and the harm caused to victims.
  • Deterrence: The sentence should deter both the offender and others from committing similar offences in the future.
  • Rehabilitation: Where possible, the sentence should encourage the offender to address underlying issues and reintegrate into society as law-abiding citizens.
  • Protection of the Public: The sentence should protect the public from further harm by the offender.
  • Fairness and Consistency: The sentence should be fair and consistent with the principles of justice, taking into account the circumstances of the case and relevant legal precedents.

By considering these factors, judges aim to arrive at a sentence that upholds the rule of law, promotes public confidence in the justice system, and ensures that justice is served for both victims and offenders alike.

How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for fraud by abuse of position?

 A solicitor can play a crucial role in helping to reduce the sentence for fraud by abuse of position by employing various legal strategies and advocacy tactics. Some ways in which a solicitor can assist in this process include:

  • Legal Advice and Representation: A solicitor can provide expert legal advice to the defendant on their rights, options, and potential defences. They can represent the defendant in court proceedings, ensuring that their interests are effectively advocated for at all stages of the legal process.
  • Negotiating Plea Bargains: In some cases, it may be beneficial for the defendant to negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecution. A solicitor can engage in these negotiations on behalf of the defendant, seeking to secure a favourable plea deal that may result in reduced charges or a lighter sentence in exchange for the defendant’s cooperation or admission of guilt.
  • Presenting Mitigating Factors: A solicitor can identify and present mitigating factors to the court that may justify a more lenient sentence. This may include factors such as the defendant’s remorse, cooperation with authorities, lack of prior criminal history, personal circumstances, or evidence of rehabilitation efforts.
  • Challenging Aggravating Factors: Conversely, a solicitor can challenge any aggravating factors presented by the prosecution that may justify a harsher sentence. This may involve scrutinising the evidence presented against the defendant, cross-examining witnesses, and presenting counter arguments to mitigate the impact of these factors on sentencing.
  • Expert Witnesses and Evidence: A solicitor can engage expert witnesses, such as forensic accountants or psychologists, to provide evidence or testimony that supports the defendant’s case and helps to mitigate their culpability or the severity of the offence.
  • Sentencing Submissions: During the sentencing hearing, a solicitor can make persuasive submissions to the court on behalf of the defendant, highlighting relevant case law, sentencing guidelines, and mitigating factors that support a reduced sentence.
  • Appeals and Post-Sentencing Remedies: If the defendant is unhappy with the outcome of their case, a solicitor can advise on the possibility of appealing the verdict or sentence. They can assist in preparing appeal grounds, lodging appeals with the appropriate appellate court, and representing the defendant in appeal proceedings.

A skilled and experienced solicitor can provide invaluable assistance to defendants facing charges of fraud by abuse of position, helping to navigate the complexities of the legal process and advocating effectively for a fair and just outcome.

Where to get more help

 If you need more help with a fraud by abuse of position case, seek advice from an experienced fraud solicitor today. Getting advice as early in the process as possible is your best bet to ensure that your rights are protected, and to maximise your chances of achieving a favourable outcome. Get in touch with the team at Stuart Miller Solicitors today for a free consultation.

OUR COMMITMENTS TO YOU:

  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
4.6
Based on 339 reviews
×
js_loader

Further Reading

Emergency?

Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.