• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles

What is the maximum sentence for False Accounting?

VAT fraud

Allegations of false accounting can have severe ramifications for individuals and businesses. If you or your organisation are facing charges of false accounting, it is vitally important that you understand the nature of the offence under English law, potential penalties, and how an experienced legal team can provide a robust defence. This article sheds light on the issue of false accounting, examining the key statutes and sentencing guidelines that might come into play if you are prosecuted. We will also explore strategies that skilled legal counsel may employ to mitigate consequences and protect the interests of their clients.

What is the offence of false accounting?

In England, false accounting is a criminal offence that falls under the umbrella of fraud. It involves intentionally falsifying, concealing, or altering accounting records or financial statements for fraudulent purposes. False accounting can occur in various contexts, such as business accounting, tax reporting, or financial reporting for organisations.

The primary legislation governing the offence of false accounting in England is Section 17 of the Theft Act 1968. This statute defines false accounting and outlines the elements necessary for a conviction. Additionally, the Fraud Act 2006 also addresses related fraudulent conduct and may be applicable depending on the circumstances.

To secure a conviction for false accounting, the prosecution typically needs to prove the following elements:

  • Dishonesty: The accused acted dishonestly by falsifying or altering accounting records.
  • Intent: The accused had the intention to deceive or defraud by their actions.
  • Falsehood: The accounting records or financial statements were deliberately misrepresented or altered.
  • Materiality: The false entries or alterations were significant enough to impact the financial position or deceive others.
  • Knowledge: The accused was aware that the information being recorded or altered was false or misleading.

Examples of false accounting include:

  • A company executive inflates revenue figures in financial statements to attract investors and inflate stock prices.
  • An accountant manipulates expense records to embezzle funds from the company.
  • A tax preparer fabricates deductions on a client’s tax return to reduce their tax liability unlawfully.
  • An employee alters sales records to meet unrealistic targets set by management.
  • A nonprofit organisation’s treasurer falsifies donation records to misappropriate funds for personal use.
  • A contractor overstates costs on invoices submitted to a client for reimbursement.
  • A bank employee alters customer account records to conceal unauthorised transactions.
  • A government official manipulates budget reports to syphon public funds for personal gain.
  • A financial advisor fabricates investment returns to attract new clients and retain existing ones.
  • An insurance agent falsifies claims records to obtain payouts for non-existent losses.

These examples illustrate how false accounting can occur in various sectors and can involve different motives and methods. That said, in each case, the common thread is the deliberate manipulation or misrepresentation of financial information for fraudulent purposes.

What is the maximum sentence for false accounting?

The maximum sentence for false accounting in England and Wales depends on the severity of the offence and other aggravating or mitigating factors. According to the Sentencing Council guidelines for fraud, including false accounting, the courts consider several factors when determining the appropriate sentence. These factors include the amount of money involved, the level of planning and sophistication of the offence, the impact on victims or the public, the defendant’s level of culpability, and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

For false accounting offences, the maximum penalty under the Theft Act 1968, Section 17, is imprisonment for up to 7 years. Under the Fraud Act 2006, the maximum penalty is 10 years’ imprisonment.

Aggravating factors that could lead to a higher sentence may include:

  • Large financial losses incurred by victims or organisations.
  • Abuse of position of trust or authority.
  • Prolonged or systematic fraudulent conduct.
  • Deliberate targeting of vulnerable individuals or groups.
  • Attempts to conceal or cover up the offence.

Mitigating factors that could lead to a lower sentence may include:

  • Cooperation with authorities during the investigation or prosecution.
  • Genuine remorse or acknowledgment of wrongdoing.
  • Restitution of funds or efforts to rectify the harm caused.
  • Previous good character or lack of prior convictions.

It is the court’s job to consider the specific facts of each case and apply the relevant legal principles and sentencing guidelines to determine an appropriate sentence. Therefore, while the maximum sentence for false accounting is 7 or 10 years’ imprisonment, depending on the statute you are prosecuted under, the actual sentence you may find imposed on you can vary significantly based on the circumstances of your exact case.

What factors influence sentencing for false accounting?

When sentencing for false accounting in England and Wales, judges take into account various factors to determine an appropriate punishment. These factors include aggravating and mitigating circumstances as outlined above as well as other considerations mentioned in Sentencing Council guidelines. Here’s an outline of the main considerations:

  • Amount of Loss or Potential Loss: The financial impact of the false accounting is a crucial factor. Larger losses or potential losses typically result in harsher sentences.
  • Level of Planning and Sophistication: The extent to which the false accounting was premeditated, carefully orchestrated, or involved sophisticated methods may influence the severity of the sentence.
  • Abuse of Position of Trust or Authority: If the offender abused a position of trust or authority to commit the offence, such as a senior executive or financial controller, this aggravating factor could lead to a more severe sentence.
  • Impact on Victims or Organisations: The harm caused to individuals, businesses, or organisations affected by the false accounting is considered. Severe financial or reputational damage may lead to a more substantial sentence.
  • Duration and Frequency of the Offence: Whether the false accounting was a one-time occurrence or part of a sustained pattern of fraudulent conduct can impact sentencing.
  • Attempts to Conceal or Cover Up the Offence: Efforts made by the offender to conceal or cover up the false accounting, such as falsifying additional documents or obstructing investigations, may aggravate the offence.
  • Cooperation with Authorities: Genuine cooperation with the police or regulatory agencies during the investigation or prosecution may be considered a mitigating factor.
  • Remorse and Acknowledgment of Wrongdoing: Demonstrating genuine remorse for the offence and taking responsibility for one’s actions may mitigate the sentence.
  • Restitution or Compensation: Efforts made by the offender to repay or compensate victims for their losses may be taken into account as a mitigating factor.
  • Personal Circumstances of the Offender: Factors such as the offender’s age, health, mental state, previous criminal record (if any), and personal circumstances are considered in determining an appropriate sentence.

Judges are required to balance the need for punishment, deterrence, rehabilitation, and protection of the public when sentencing for false accounting.

How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for false accounting?

Engaging a solicitor when facing charges of false accounting can be crucial in navigating the legal process and working towards a favourable outcome, including reducing the sentence. Here’s how a solicitor can help and what to expect when meeting with one:

  • Legal Expertise and Guidance: Solicitors specialising in criminal law, particularly fraud offences like false accounting, possess the legal knowledge and experience necessary to provide expert guidance throughout the legal proceedings. They can explain the charges, potential penalties, and available defences, helping the accused understand their rights and options.
  • Case Assessment and Strategy Development: A solicitor will thoroughly review the details of the case, including evidence, witness statements, and any mitigating factors. Based on this assessment, they can develop a strategic defence plan tailored to the specific circumstances of the case, aiming to minimise the potential sentence.
  • Negotiation with Prosecution: Solicitors can engage in negotiations with the prosecution to explore the possibility of plea bargains or reduced charges in exchange for cooperation or admissions. They can advocate for a favourable resolution that mitigates the severity of the sentence.
  • Representation in Court: A solicitor will represent the accused in court proceedings, presenting the defence case, cross-examining witnesses, and making legal arguments on behalf of their client. Their presence can provide reassurance and support during what can be a daunting process.
  • Mitigation and Sentencing Advocacy: In the event of conviction, a solicitor can present mitigating factors to the court that may justify a more lenient sentence. This may include evidence of remorse, cooperation with authorities, personal circumstances, or efforts towards restitution. Solicitors can eloquently advocate for their client’s interests during sentencing hearings.
  • Appeals and Post-Conviction Remedies: If convicted, a solicitor can advise on the possibility of appealing the verdict or sentence, as well as exploring other post-conviction remedies available under the law.

Where to get more help

Engaging a solicitor as early in the process as possible can significantly improve the individual’s chances of achieving a favourable outcome in a false accounting case, including minimising the sentence if you are found guilty. If you or someone you care about is facing a charge for false accounting, get in touch with the team at Stuart Miller Solicitors for a free and friendly consultation today.


  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
Based on 346 reviews

Further Reading


Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.