Credit card fraud is a serious offence that, sadly, is committed extensively across the UK every year. Despite being common, the consequences of credit card fraud can be severe, with judges taking a harsh view of a crime that affects not just credit card companies, but business owners and the wider general public as a result. In this article, we will briefly elucidate the offence of credit card fraud, delineate the maximum penalty you could face, summarise key points from the sentencing guidelines, discuss how a solicitor can aid in reducing your sentence, and provide avenues for further assistance.
What is the offence of credit card fraud?
In England, credit card fraud is a serious criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006. To secure a conviction for credit card fraud, the prosecution must typically prove several elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Fraudulent Representation: The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant made a false representation. This could involve using someone else’s credit card details without their permission, creating counterfeit credit cards, or providing false information to obtain a credit card.
- Intention to Deceive: The prosecution must establish that the defendant acted with the intention to deceive or to make a gain for themselves or another, or to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
- Unlawful Gain or Loss: It must be shown that the defendant’s actions resulted in either a financial gain for themselves or another party, or a financial loss to the legitimate cardholder, the credit card issuer, or another party.
- Knowledge or Recklessness: The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant was aware that their actions were dishonest or acted recklessly as to whether their actions were dishonest.
- Use of False Instrument: If the fraud involved the use of counterfeit credit cards or other false instruments, the prosecution must prove the creation, possession, or use of such instruments.
- Causation: The prosecution must establish a causal link between the defendant’s actions and the financial gain or loss that resulted.
If the prosecution can prove all these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant may be found guilty of credit card fraud, which can carry significant penalties including fines and imprisonment. Each case is unique, and the specific evidence required for a conviction may vary depending on the circumstances of the fraud.
Examples of credit card fraud offences include:
- Skimming: Criminals use a device called a skimmer to steal credit card information during legitimate transactions. Skimmers are often attached to card readers at ATMs or point-of-sale terminals.
- Phishing: Fraudsters send fake emails or text messages posing as legitimate institutions, such as banks or credit card companies, to trick recipients into providing their credit card details or other sensitive information.
- Carding: This involves using stolen credit card information to make purchases online. Criminals may obtain card details through data breaches, hacking, or purchasing them from the dark web.
- Counterfeit Cards: Criminals create counterfeit credit cards using stolen card information. They may encode the information onto blank cards or alter existing cards to match stolen details.
- Lost or Stolen Cards: Fraudsters may use lost or stolen credit cards to make unauthorised purchases before the cardholder can report it missing.
- Account Takeover: Hackers gain unauthorised access to a victim’s online banking or credit card account to make purchases or transfer funds without the victim’s knowledge.
- Card Not Present (CNP) Fraud: Fraudsters use stolen credit card details to make purchases online, over the phone, or by mail where the physical card is not required for the transaction.
- Identity Theft: Criminals steal personal information, including credit card details, to open new credit card accounts or take over existing accounts in the victim’s name.
- Employee Fraud: Employees with access to credit card information may misuse the data for personal gain, such as making unauthorised purchases or selling the information to criminals.
- Triangulation Fraud: Fraudsters use a legitimate card to purchase goods from a retailer, then resell those goods to unsuspecting buyers. The fraudster never delivers the purchased items and disappears with the funds, leaving both the retailer and the buyer at a loss.
What is the maximum sentence for credit card fraud?
In England and Wales, the maximum sentence for credit card fraud depends on the specific circumstances of the offence, including the amount of money involved and the level of harm caused to the victims. The Sentencing Council provides guidelines for judges and magistrates to determine appropriate sentences for various offences, including fraud. Under the Fraud Act 2006, the maximum sentence is 10 years’ imprisonment.
According to the fraud sentencing guidelines issued by the Sentencing Council, the penalty for credit card fraud can vary, though the cap will be at 10 years’ imprisonment. For individuals convicted of fraud offences, including credit card fraud, the sentencing guidelines consider factors such as the level of culpability, harm caused, and any aggravating or mitigating factors present in the case.
In cases of credit card fraud where the amount involved is significant or where the offence is part of a larger criminal enterprise, offenders may face lengthy custodial sentences. The guidelines suggest that the most serious cases of fraud, including those involving large-scale credit card fraud schemes or sophisticated methods of deception, can result in sentences of several years’ imprisonment.
Additionally, offenders convicted of credit card fraud may be subject to ancillary orders, such as confiscation orders to recover proceeds of the crime, compensation orders to compensate victims for their losses, or financial reporting orders to monitor the offender’s financial activities.
What factors influence sentencing for credit card fraud?
When sentencing for credit card fraud in England and Wales, judges consider various factors to determine an appropriate punishment. These factors aim to reflect the seriousness of the offence and the culpability of the offender. Here are the main considerations:
- Level of Culpability: Judges assess the defendant’s degree of responsibility for the fraud. This includes whether the fraud was committed intentionally, recklessly, or negligently.
- Harm Caused: The extent of harm caused to victims is a crucial factor. This encompasses both financial loss and any emotional or psychological harm suffered as a result of the fraud.
- Financial Loss: The amount of money involved in the fraud is significant. Larger losses typically result in more severe sentences.
- Use of Sophisticated Methods: If the offender used sophisticated or elaborate methods to commit the fraud, such as hacking into secure systems or creating counterfeit credit cards, this may aggravate their culpability.
- Duration and Frequency: The duration and frequency of the fraudulent activity are taken into account. Prolonged or repeated offences may lead to harsher penalties.
- Victim Vulnerability: Exploiting vulnerable victims, such as the elderly or those with limited financial knowledge, aggravates the seriousness of the offence.
- Benefit to the Offender: Judges consider whether the offender gained personally from the fraud and the extent of their financial gain.
- Impact on Community Confidence: The impact of the fraud on public trust and confidence in financial institutions and electronic payment systems is a relevant factor.
- Remorse and Cooperation: Demonstrating genuine remorse and cooperating with the authorities during the investigation and legal proceedings can mitigate the sentence.
- Previous Convictions: The offender’s criminal record, particularly for similar offences or other forms of dishonesty, influences the severity of the sentence.
- Early Guilty Plea: Pleading guilty at an early stage of proceedings can lead to a reduction in sentence as it demonstrates acceptance of responsibility and saves court time and resources.
- Personal Mitigating Circumstances: Individual circumstances, such as the offender’s age, mental health, or personal circumstances, may be considered in mitigation.
These factors, along with any other relevant circumstances specific to the case, guide judges in determining an appropriate sentence for credit card fraud, ensuring it reflects both the seriousness of the offence and the personal circumstances of the offender.
How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for credit card fraud?
Solicitors offer invaluable assistance in several key areas:
- Legal Guidance and Strategy: They provide detailed legal counsel regarding the charges faced and potential ramifications, including the anticipated sentencing upon conviction. By evaluating the strength of the prosecution’s case, solicitors can devise a bespoke defence strategy that aligns with the unique aspects of the case.
- Court Representation: Solicitors play a vital role in advocating for defendants within the courtroom, safeguarding their rights, and ensuring their case is presented persuasively. Their expertise allows them to challenge prosecution evidence effectively and present mitigating factors that may sway the court towards a more favourable ruling.
- Mitigation Presentation: During sentencing proceedings, solicitors skillfully present mitigating factors to the court. By emphasising aspects of the defendant’s character, background, and personal circumstances – such as expressions of remorse, efforts towards rehabilitation, and positive societal contributions – they aim to secure a more lenient sentence.
Where to get more help
For further assistance and advice on sentencing and other issues pertaining to the offence of credit card fraud, get in touch with the team at Stuart Miller Solicitors today. Our approachable and understanding staff are available to assist with your case, regardless of your guilt or innocence.
OUR COMMITMENTS TO YOU:
-
Responsive
A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.
-
Empathetic
We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.
-
Specialised
Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.
-
Proactive
We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.
-
Engaged
You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.
-
Caring
We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.
-
Tenacious
We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.