• Top 1% of Defence Law Firms

  • Defended over 50,000 Cases

  • 5 star google reviews

  • 40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise

Criminal Defence Articles

What is the Maximum Sentence for Charity Fraud?

credit card fraud

If you or someone you care about is facing a charity fraud allegation, determining the potential maximum sentence is a common concern. Solicitors receive many inquiries about potential sentences in such cases. While charity fraud penalties can be serious, there are possible avenues for mitigating punishment if found guilty. This article aims to provide an overview of charity fraud, discuss the potential maximum sentence, highlight considerations from sentencing guidelines, explore strategies a solicitor might use to minimize the sentence, and suggest additional resources for assistance.

What is the offence of charity fraud?

In England, the offence of charity fraud is governed primarily by the Fraud Act 2006, specifically under Section 4 (“Fraud by abuse of position”) and Section 2 (“Fraud by false representation”). Additionally, the Charities Act 2011 provides supplementary regulations regarding the operation and governance of charities, including provisions related to fraud.

The offence of charity fraud typically consists of the following elements:

  • Intent: The individual knowingly engages in deceptive practices with the intention of defrauding a charity or its beneficiaries.
  • Misrepresentation: The individual misrepresents information or presents false statements with the aim of deceiving the charity or its stakeholders.
  • Abuse of Position: The individual exploits their position within the charity for personal gain or to cause loss to the charity or its beneficiaries.

What are some examples of charity fraud?

Examples of charity fraud include:

  • Submitting false financial statements to obtain funding from donors or grant-making organisations.
  • Diverting charitable funds for personal use.
  • Creating fictitious charities or charitable projects to solicit donations.
  • Overstating expenses or understating income in financial reports to conceal embezzlement.
  • Misappropriating donations intended for specific charitable purposes for personal gain.
  • Using deceptive methods, such as door-to-door canvassing or unsolicited phone calls, to solicit donations for a fictitious charity or misrepresenting the purpose of the charity.
  • Creating fake employees or contractors within the charity’s payroll system and diverting funds intended for salaries or services to personal accounts.
  • Colluding with others to manipulate the bidding process for charitable projects or contracts.
  • Illegally transferring ownership of valuable assets, such as property or equipment owned by the charity, into personal ownership.
  • Fabricating invoices, receipts, or other financial documents to create the appearance of legitimate expenses or transactions.

What is the maximum sentence for charity fraud in England and Wales?

The maximum sentence for charity fraud in England and Wales depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the severity of the offence. The Fraud Act 2006, under which charity fraud falls, provides for a maximum custodial sentence of up to 10 years for the most serious cases.

The Sentencing Council guidelines offer guidance to judges and magistrates when determining the appropriate sentence for charity fraud offences. Factors such as the amount of money involved, the level of planning and sophistication of the fraud, the impact on victims and charitable beneficiaries, and the defendant’s level of culpability are taken into consideration.

  • For cases falling under Section 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 (“Fraud by abuse of position”), where individuals abuse their position within a charity for personal gain, the Sentencing Council guidelines suggest that custodial sentences are likely, particularly for cases involving substantial sums of money or significant breach of trust. The guidelines recommend considering aggravating factors such as the exploitation of vulnerable victims or the use of sophisticated techniques to perpetrate the fraud, which may lead to longer sentences.
  • Similarly, for cases falling under Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 (“Fraud by false representation”), where individuals make false representations to charities or their donors, the Sentencing Council guidelines advise that custodial sentences may be appropriate, especially if the fraud involves significant harm or loss to the charity or its beneficiaries.


In the end, the sentencing decision is at the discretion of the judge or magistrate, who considers all relevant factors and mitigating circumstances presented during the trial. They will aim to impose a sentence that reflects the seriousness of the offence and provides a deterrent to others, while also taking into account any mitigating factors, such as early guilty pleas or remorse shown by the defendant.

What factors influence sentencing for charity fraud?

When sentencing for charity fraud, judges consider various factors to determine an appropriate penalty. These factors, outlined in Sentencing Council guidance and relevant legal principles, include:

  • Amount of Loss: The magnitude of financial loss incurred by the charity or its beneficiaries due to the fraudulent activity is a significant consideration. Greater losses typically result in more severe sentences.
  • Level of Planning and Organisation: Judges assess the degree of premeditation and sophistication involved in the commission of the fraud. Deliberate, carefully orchestrated schemes may attract harsher sentences.
  • Impact on Victims and Charitable Beneficiaries: The effect of the fraud on the charity’s operations, beneficiaries, donors, and other stakeholders is crucial. Judges consider whether vulnerable individuals or communities were disproportionately affected.
  • Abuse of Trust or Position: If the offender exploited a position of authority, trust, or responsibility within the charity to perpetrate the fraud, this aggravating factor is taken into account. Breach of fiduciary duty aggravates the seriousness of the offence.
  • Duration and Frequency of Offending: Persistent or prolonged fraudulent conduct may warrant a more severe sentence. Repeat offences or a pattern of fraudulent behaviour demonstrate a heightened disregard for the law.
  • Concealment and Obstruction: Attempts to conceal or cover up the fraudulent activity, such as falsifying records or obstructing investigations, aggravate the offence and may lead to an increased sentence.
  • Personal Gain: The extent to which the offender personally benefited from the fraud is considered. Greater financial gain obtained at the expense of the charity typically results in a harsher sentence.
  • Cooperation with Authorities: Defendants who cooperate fully with law enforcement, provide information, or assist in the recovery of assets may receive some mitigation in sentencing.

In determining sentences for charity fraud cases, judges strive to strike a balance between proportionality, fairness, and rehabilitation. They consider the severity of the offence, the individual circumstances of each case, and the principles of justice to impose sentences that are appropriate and reflective of the nature of the crime.

How can a solicitor help with reducing the sentence for charity fraud?

Engaging a solicitor to assist in reducing the sentence for charity fraud can be instrumental in navigating the legal complexities and advocating for a favourable outcome. Here’s how a solicitor can help:

  • Legal Expertise and Strategy: Solicitors specialising in criminal law possess a deep understanding of relevant legislation, case law, and sentencing guidelines pertaining to charity fraud offences. They can develop a robust legal strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of the case, aiming to mitigate the sentence.
  • Case Preparation and Representation: Solicitors meticulously prepare the case by gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecution’s case. They provide expert representation in court, advocating for leniency and presenting compelling arguments in favour of a reduced sentence.
  • Negotiation and Plea Bargaining: Solicitors negotiate with the prosecution on behalf of their clients, exploring opportunities for plea bargains or alternative sentencing arrangements. They may seek to secure a plea to a lesser charge or negotiate a sentence reduction in exchange for cooperation or mitigating circumstances.
  • Sentencing Mitigation: Solicitors present persuasive mitigation evidence to the court, highlighting factors that justify a more lenient sentence. This may include evidence of remorse, cooperation with authorities, personal circumstances, or efforts towards rehabilitation.
  • Appeals and Post-Sentencing Advocacy: If a harsh sentence is imposed, solicitors can advise on the prospects of appeal and represent the client in appellate proceedings. They may also advocate for post-sentencing measures, such as early release or community-based sentences, to minimise the impact of incarceration.

When choosing a solicitor for assistance with charity fraud offences, consider the following factors:

  • Look for solicitors with expertise in criminal law and a track record of successfully handling fraud cases, including charity fraud. Specialised knowledge of this area of law is crucial for effective representation.
  • Seek recommendations from trusted sources or review solicitors’ credentials, testimonials, and case outcomes. A reputable solicitor with a positive reputation demonstrates competence and reliability.
  • Choose a solicitor with whom you feel comfortable communicating openly and honestly. Effective communication and a strong attorney-client rapport are essential for building trust and collaboration throughout the legal process.

When meeting with a solicitor for the first time, expect a confidential consultation where you can discuss the details of your case openly. The solicitor will listen attentively to your concerns, gather relevant information, and provide initial legal advice regarding the potential consequences and options available to you.

Where to get further help

If you’re facing charity fraud charges, you might be feeling overwhelmed by concerns about the potential sentence. But don’t hesitate to seek help from the professionals at Stuart Miller Solicitors. Our knowledgeable and compassionate team can provide guidance and support tailored to your specific situation. We’ll assist you with all aspects of your case, from sentencing to any other legal matters related to charity fraud. Contact us today for expert advice and assistance.


  • Responsive

    A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.

  • Empathetic

    We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.

  • Specialised

    Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.

  • Proactive

    We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.

  • Engaged

    You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.

  • Caring

    We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.

  • Tenacious

    We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.

Google Rating
Based on 352 reviews

Further Reading


Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.