Top 1% of Defence Law Firms
Defended over 50,000 Cases
5 star google reviews
39+ years of experience
If you or someone close faces a first electoral fraud charge, feeling anxious and eager to begin your defence is completely understandable. Electoral fraud cuts at the heart of democracy and so is dealt with sternly by UK courts. Accordingly, engaging an expert defence solicitor promptly should be a top priority. This article provides an overview of electoral fraud offences, looking at what the offence is and what some typical examples of the offence are, as well as discussing sentencing of first-time offenders and clarifying imprisonment risks. We also outline how to get in touch with our team for robust legal assistance if you find yourself facing such a charge for the first time.
Electoral fraud is an offence under the Representation of the People Act 1983. It involves dishonest conduct aimed at influencing election results such as false voting, bribery, and tampering with ballots.
Key electoral fraud offences include undue influence, bribery, and falsification of returns under the 1983 Act. For a conviction, the prosecution must generally establish:
Electoral fraud carries penalties of unlimited fines and up to two years’ imprisonment. Prosecutions most often occur in the Magistrates’ Court, but could be heard in the Crown Court as well. Sentencing generally accounts for factors like the impact on democratic rights and the scale of the offending in terms of votes affected.
Examples of this offence include:
If you are suspected of electoral fraud in England and Wales, you will most likely face investigation and potential prosecution under the Representation of the People Act 1983.
Here’s a general outline of what could happen:
Regardless of the exact process imposed by the authorities, getting expert electoral fraud representation on side at the earliest opportunity is imperative. The earlier you have representation on side, the better your chances at a positive case outcome will be.
Electoral fraud is a serious offence that undermines democratic processes and with activities like impersonation, false registrations, undue influence, bribery, and tampering with ballot papers or postal votes being all too common, it is unsurprising that the courts come down so harshly on offenders.
Aggravating factors like large scale organised fraud or corruption of elected officials can significantly increase sentences. Mitigating factors, on the other hand, such as showing remorse or this being a first time offence may reduce the ultimate sentence given.
Maximum penalties are two years’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. Police and electoral authorities use data analysis to identify patterns of fraud across constituencies, so there may be regional prerogatives to impose harsher sentences if electoral fraud is a greater problem in some areas than others.
Additional sanctions can include voiding a candidate’s election victory if serious breaches occurred. The Electoral Commission and local authorities have powers to suspend or remove officials who enable fraud. Public funding for a candidate or party can also be withheld.
Here are some potential defences that can be raised in response to allegations of electoral fraud:
Any defence of an electoral fraud allegation will be complex, as voting and other democratic processes are often lengthy and involve numerous parties, many of whom could influence case progression. Getting an expert electoral fraud solicitor on side is critical to understanding the best strategies and tactics for your defence.
Predicting whether a first time electoral fraud offence could result in imprisonment is difficult, as numerous factors are considered during sentencing. The scale and impact of the fraud is a key consideration – large, organised schemes seriously undermining free elections are viewed very harshly. Harm to public confidence in the electoral process will also be assessed, with substantial damage increasing the likelihood of custody.
Mitigating factors like previous good character, showing remorse, cooperating with investigations, and attempting to make amends may assist first-time offenders in arguing against prison. However, aggravating factors like acting deliberately for political gain, exploiting a position of authority, or trying to conceal the fraud point towards harsher punishment.
While minor technical breaches may lead to suspended sentences, judges are generally unwilling to suspend prison sentences for serious acts subverting democratic processes. Those facing prosecution should obtain expert legal advice to understand the realistic prospects of imprisonment based on precedents for comparable cases.
If you or someone close to you is charged with electoral fraud, getting experienced legal help immediately can be pivotal. For those without prior convictions, an experienced electoral fraud solicitor could even get charges dropped before trial, helping to preserve personal and professional reputations and limit damage to important political campaigns. Contact Stuart Miller Solicitors today for a free initial assessment to better understand your options.
A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.
We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.
Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.
We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.
You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.
We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.
We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.