
Being accused of obtaining property by deception can be deeply stressful and raise many questions about your future. You might be unsure about what the charge actually involves, how the legal system will interpret your case, and what penalties you could face – including the possibility of imprisonment. This article aims to clearly explain what the offence means in legal terms, the potential sentencing outcomes, and the circumstances in which a court might consider a suspended sentence instead of immediate custody.
Obtaining property by deception was historically an offence under the Theft Act 1968, but since the introduction of the Fraud Act 2006, such cases are now typically prosecuted as fraud by false representation under Section 2 of that Act. However, some cases may still be prosecuted under the older legislation, particularly where the alleged offending occurred before 2007.
The offence involves dishonestly obtaining property belonging to another by means of deception, with the intention of permanently depriving the owner of that property. The key elements include dishonesty, deception (making false representations), obtaining property as a result of that deception, and intent to permanently deprive the owner. Property in this context includes money, goods, land, and other tangible items, as well as things in action such as debts and bank credits. The deception must be a false representation of fact, whether made by words, conduct, or by omitting to disclose information where there is a duty to do so.
The deception must be operative, meaning it must have influenced the victim’s decision to part with their property. If the victim would have parted with the property anyway, or was not influenced by the false representation, then the offence may not be made out.
Understand that the offence requires dishonest intent and knowledge that the representations were false or misleading. Genuine mistakes, honest misunderstandings, or situations where you believed your representations to be true would not constitute this offence.
Obtaining property by deception can be tried in either the Magistrates’ Court or the Crown Court, depending on the value involved and other factors. Under the Theft Act 1968, the maximum sentence is 10 years imprisonment, while under the Fraud Act 2006, the maximum is also 10 years imprisonment.
Courts have various sentencing options available, including community orders, suspended sentences, fines, and immediate custody.
For less serious cases involving smaller amounts, first-time offenders, or where there are strong mitigating factors, courts often consider community-based sentences such as community service, unpaid work requirements, supervision orders, or fines. More serious cases involving substantial values, sophisticated deceptions, multiple victims, or repeat offending are more likely to result in immediate prison sentences.
A suspended sentence is a custodial sentence that is delayed, allowing you to remain in the community instead of serving time in prison – so long as you meet certain conditions. The suspension period typically lasts between six months and two years, during which you must stay out of further trouble and follow any court-imposed requirements.
If you meet all conditions and avoid reoffending during this period, the prison sentence will not be enforced. However, if you breach the terms or commit another offence, the court can activate the original sentence in addition to any new penalties.
Conditions on community service could include community service, regular meetings with a probation officer, attendance at treatment or rehabilitation programmes, or restrictions on your movements or activities. These measures are designed to support rehabilitation and reduce the risk of future offences.
Judges take several factors into account when deciding whether a suspended sentence is appropriate. These can include a lack of prior convictions, signs of genuine remorse, early admission of guilt, and efforts to repay or compensate the victim. Being employed, having family responsibilities, or otherwise demonstrating stability and a low risk of reoffending can also strengthen your case for a suspended sentence.
Offences involving smaller sums of money, minimal planning, or isolated incidents are more likely to be viewed as suitable for this type of sentence – particularly if you have cooperated fully with the investigation and taken steps to address any personal issues that contributed to your behaviour.
However, certain aggravating factors can make a suspended sentence far less likely. These include a history of similar offences, deliberate or calculated deception, targeting vulnerable individuals, or failing to show any remorse.
Courts consider numerous factors when deciding whether to impose a suspended sentence for obtaining property by deception:
A charge of obtaining property by deception doesn’t automatically mean you’ll go to prison. For a court to impose an immediate custodial sentence, the offence must be considered serious enough that neither a fine nor a community-based penalty would be sufficient.
Generally, prison is more likely in cases where the deception involved a high financial value, careful planning, repeated offending, or exploitation of vulnerable individuals. Offences that show a clear breach of trust – such as those committed in a position of responsibility – or that are part of a pattern of dishonest conduct often attract harsher penalties.
However, not all offences meet this threshold. Courts may opt for alternatives to prison where the deception was limited in scope, the person involved has no prior criminal record, and there are compelling personal circumstances – such as extreme financial hardship, serious health issues, or family responsibilities. A demonstrated effort to repay losses or make amends can also influence the outcome in a positive way.
Previous convictions, especially for dishonesty, will weigh heavily against receiving a non-custodial sentence. That said, even individuals with a record may avoid immediate prison time if they show genuine rehabilitation efforts and there are strong mitigating factors.
Numerous actions will help your case:
Stuart Miller Solicitors have extensive experience in defending clients in fraud and dishonesty cases. We understand how stressful and overwhelming this situation can be, and we are here to provide the expert legal advice and representation you need. Get in touch today for a free, confidential consultation to discuss your case and explore your options.
Responsive
A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.
Empathetic
We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.
Specialised
Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.
Proactive
We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.
Engaged
You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.
Caring
We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.
Tenacious
We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.