-
Top 1% of Defence Law Firms
-
Defended over 50,000 Cases
-
5 star google reviews
-
40 Years of Criminal Law Expertise
If you are facing an allegation of tipping off, you are likely experiencing considerable anxiety about what this means for your future. You might be wondering what exactly constitutes tipping off, what sentences the courts can impose, and whether you might avoid immediate imprisonment. This article explains the offence of tipping off in straightforward terms, outlines the sentencing framework, describes how suspended sentences operate, and advises on steps you can take to achieve the most favourable outcome possible.
What is tipping off?
Tipping off is a criminal offence that occurs when someone discloses information that is likely to prejudice an investigation into money laundering or terrorist financing. The offence is designed to protect the integrity of such investigations by preventing suspects from being alerted that they are under scrutiny, which could allow them to conceal evidence, move assets, or flee.
The offence is contained in Section 333A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) for money laundering investigations, and Section 21D of the Terrorism Act 2000 for terrorist financing investigations. Under these provisions, it is an offence to make a disclosure that is likely to prejudice an investigation if you know or suspect that a money laundering or terrorist financing investigation is being conducted or contemplated.
Practical examples help clarify this. If a bank employee submits a suspicious activity report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency about a customer’s transactions, and then tells the customer that a report has been filed, this would constitute tipping off. Similarly, if an accountant suspects a client of money laundering, reports it to the authorities, and then warns the client that they have done so, this is an offence. Another scenario might involve a solicitor who learns that their firm has made a disclosure about a client, and then informs the client of this fact.
What are the usual sentences for tipping off?
The maximum sentence for tipping off under both POCA and the Terrorism Act is 5 years’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. However, actual sentences vary considerably depending on the circumstances.
Courts consider factors such as the level of knowledge and intent, the stage and nature of the underlying investigation, the consequences of the disclosure (for example, whether it resulted in the loss of evidence or assets), and the defendant’s motivation. Sentences can range from conditional discharges and fines for the least serious cases, through community orders and suspended sentences for mid-range offences, to immediate custody for the most serious.
Less serious cases might involve accidental or negligent disclosures where the defendant had limited knowledge or understanding, where no significant harm resulted, and where there was no dishonest motive. Mid-range cases typically involve deliberate disclosures where the defendant ought to have known better, perhaps where there was some harm to the investigation. The most serious cases involve deliberate disclosures motivated by corruption or self-interest, where the underlying investigation concerned serious crime, and where substantial harm resulted.
The Sentencing Council does not have specific guidelines for tipping off, so judges exercise discretion within the statutory maximum, drawing on general sentencing principles and guidelines for related offences.
What is a suspended sentence and how does it work?
A suspended sentence is a custodial sentence that the court has decided to postpone on the condition that you comply with specified requirements and commit no further offences during a defined period. The court determines both the length of the prison sentence (which cannot exceed 2 years for a single offence) and the duration of the suspension period (which must be between 6 months and 2 years).
During the suspension period, you are required to comply with conditions set by the court. These may include undertaking unpaid work in the community (typically between 40 and 300 hours), participating in rehabilitation activities designed to address offending behaviour, observing a curfew with electronic monitoring, abstaining from contact with specified individuals, or residing at a particular address.
If you successfully complete the suspension period without breaching the requirements and without committing any further offences, the sentence will expire and you will not serve any time in prison. That said, if you fail to comply with any requirement, or if you commit another offence during the suspension period, the court will normally activate the suspended sentence, meaning you will be sent to prison to serve the original term in addition to any penalty for the breach or new offence.
Can tipping off result in a suspended sentence?
Yes, tipping off can result in a suspended sentence, though whether this outcome is likely depends on the specific facts of your case. The court must first determine whether the offence is serious enough to cross the custody threshold, meaning that only a custodial sentence is appropriate. If so, the court must then consider whether there are grounds to suspend that sentence.
Suspended sentences are more likely in cases involving less serious disclosures where the defendant’s culpability is lower. For example, if you made a disclosure without fully appreciating that it might prejudice an investigation, if you acted impulsively without dishonest motive, if the underlying investigation was relatively minor, and if no significant harm resulted, a suspended sentence is a realistic possibility, particularly if you have no previous convictions and can demonstrate strong personal mitigation.
Conversely, if the disclosure was deliberate and motivated by financial gain or personal advantage, if it related to a serious criminal investigation (such as terrorism or major organised crime), if it resulted in substantial harm (such as loss of evidence or allowing a suspect to abscond), or if you have relevant previous convictions, immediate custody becomes significantly more probable.
What factors do courts consider when deciding on a suspended sentence for tipping off?
When assessing whether to suspend a sentence for tipping off, judges consider numerous factors. The level of knowledge and intent is paramount: did you know that your disclosure would prejudice an investigation, or did you merely suspect or fail to consider the possibility? Deliberate disclosures are treated more seriously than negligent ones.
- The seriousness of the underlying investigation matters. Tipping off in relation to terrorism or major organised crime is viewed much more gravely than disclosures relating to minor investigations. The consequences are crucial: did it cause substantial harm, such as loss of evidence or flight of suspects? Or was the impact minimal?
- Your motivation is relevant. Were you acting out of misplaced loyalty, financial corruption, or ignorance? Disclosures made for personal gain or to assist criminals are aggravating factors.
- Personal mitigation can be compelling. If you have an unblemished record, strong character references, and evidence of remorse, this supports suspension. Family responsibilities carry weight. Evidence that you are unlikely to reoffend strengthens your case.
- Aggravating factors include previous convictions, attempts to conceal your conduct, or evidence of corruption. Professional defendants who breach their duties may face harsher treatment given their training.
How serious does the offence have to be for a prison sentence for tipping off?
Cases involving deliberate, calculated disclosures related to serious underlying criminality (such as terrorism, organised crime, or major fraud), where the disclosure resulted in significant harm to the investigation, will almost always result in immediate custody. This is particularly true where the defendant was motivated by financial gain, held a position of trust, or has previous relevant convictions.
At the other end of the spectrum, cases involving negligent or thoughtless disclosures, relating to less serious underlying matters, causing minimal harm, where the defendant acted without dishonest motive and has no previous convictions, may not cross the custody threshold at all. Such cases might be dealt with by way of community orders or even fines.
The boundary between suspended and immediate custody in the middle range depends on the balance of aggravating and mitigating factors. Strong personal mitigation, genuine remorse, and a realistic prospect of rehabilitation can tip the balance towards suspension.
What can I do to improve my chances of getting a suspended sentence for tipping off?
If you are facing a charge of tipping off, taking the right steps early can significantly improve your prospects. The first and most important action is to instruct specialist criminal defence solicitors with experience in money laundering and regulatory offences. They can assess the strength of the prosecution case, identify available defences, and present your mitigation in the most effective manner.
Demonstrating genuine remorse and understanding of the seriousness of your actions is also very important. If you made the disclosure through ignorance or misunderstanding rather than dishonesty, gather evidence to support this, such as employment records showing lack of training, or evidence of the circumstances that led to the disclosure.
Compile comprehensive evidence of your personal circumstances: character references from employers, colleagues, and community figures; medical evidence if relevant; proof of family responsibilities. If you are employed in a regulated profession, evidence that you have undertaken additional compliance training or taken steps to ensure you understand your obligations can be persuasive.
Where to get more help
The team at Stuart Miller Solicitors has substantial experience defending clients facing allegations under the Proceeds of Crime Act and Terrorism Act, including tipping off offences. Get in touch today for a free, confidential consultation to discuss your case and explore your options.
OUR COMMITMENTS TO YOU:
-
Responsive
A legal expert will consult you within 24 hours of making an enquiry.
-
Empathetic
We will always treat you with trust, understanding and respect.
-
Specialised
Your case will be handled by an expert who specialises in your type of offence.
-
Proactive
We will take early action to end proceedings as soon as it is practically and legally possible to do so.
-
Engaged
You will be kept updated on your case at all times. We will provide a named contact available to answer your questions.
-
Caring
We understand this is a difficult and stressful time for you and your family. Our team will support you every step of the way.
-
Tenacious
We will never give up on your case. We fight tirelessly to get you the best possible outcome.
Google Rating
Based on 420 reviews
×
